TO those of us who follow Pakistan’s economy, the embarrassment suffered by the country at the Nato summit in Chicago came as no surprise.

Too often we have seen important matters fail because there are too many decision-makers, too many veto points in our country. The kind of bluster that usually accompanies these affairs is also familiar stuff, especially the kind of bluster where we know the person creating the din doesn’t really have the mettle to stand by it.

Of course the question of opening Nato supply lines is the most important political and economic issue facing the country now. And it’s no secret that all players now want to see the supply lines opened and the dispute to be unwound. But nobody is willing to own the consequences.

Critical economic decisions have often found themselves in this very same cul-de-sac, although nobody has attached to them the kind of importance that is being given to the Nato supply issue. This is a pity because those decisions, if made when they needed to be made, would have meant less dependence on foreign inflows today.

Take the example of tax reform — although one could pluck examples from other areas too. Every government that has been in power since 1990 has tried to advance the cause of tax reform, of documentation of the economy, of implementing a value added tax. And every government has found that the opposition loves to deploy the same arguments against the effort. When the opposition comes to power, they try to take the same decisions, and find themselves stymied by those who held power before them.

Remember when the government was trying to pass what they called the ‘Reformed GST’ legislation? Remember the outcry, even from the coalition partners? None of that had anything to do with taxes, inflation, or any such.

To some extent, the parties opposing the measure were reacting to the concerns of their constituencies, which were small shopkeepers. But the same constituency has been screaming itself hoarse over the issue of extortion rackets and a deteriorating law and order situation, yet none of the parties are willing to pick up that flag and fight that fight.

For the coalition partner, this was an opportunity to renegotiate the terms of its entry into the coalition. For the opposition, it was opposition for the sake of it. They knew if this legislation passes, the IMF could release the next tranche of its facility, and that would help the government by giving them a little more breathing room with the reserves and the budgetary support they indirectly provide. The only game for them was to deny the government this opportunity.

Everybody got their way. The reform measure failed miserably, and our tax-to-GDP ratio has continued to fall, and our dependence on foreign inflows has continued to rise. Whenever the next government comes into power, whether it’s composed of the PPP or the PML-N, it will have to try one more time to make the move to a value added tax. And rest assured, whoever is in opposition will resist the move.

Something similar is happening with the attempt to reopen the Nato supply lines. I hope it is easy enough to see how these two stories are linked. The question of opening Nato supply lines is intimately linked to the issue of foreign inflows in our aid-dependent economy.

The dependence on aid grows in large part out of our inability to generate sufficient taxes to pay for the government’s most basic expenses. And both ends of this chain, taxes and aid, which feed into the long-term viability of this country, are held hostage by a politics that grows out of an infantile and emotional populism.

There is some irony in the fact that the question of restoring Nato supply lines is coming to a head at the same time as the government is preparing to present an election year budget.

To give credit where credit is due, in both cases the ruling party made its fair share of effort to reach out and get everyone on board. But here the credit ends. When the time has come to translate words into actions, they have failed totally.

It was during the RGST episode that the government formulated its ‘plans’ for the restructuring of the public-sector enterprises, in some cases giving “a time frame of four to six months for implementation”. We can see where those plans stand today, almost two years down the road.

But the other parties to the whole power struggle have played an even more destructive role. Nawaz Sharif sorely needs wise counsel at this time, to teach him how to play the part of an opposition leader. During the RGST episode, for instance, he complained that if he cooperates with the government, “they call me the friendly opposition”.

Elsewhere he said that he has cooperated with the government in the NFC award and the 18th Amendment, and enough is enough, now the time has come to oppose them. What sort of reasoning is that to bring to the table when matters of the long-term stability of the country are being discussed? Politics is no place to be acting like a jilted lover.

Then there is the military, fanning the flames of emotionalism on a number of occasions in the aftermath of Salala, then going on to issue a report titled ‘Pakistan’s perspective on [Nato] investigation report…’ Now with all due respect, isn’t it the job of the civilian government to be issuing ‘Pakistan’s perspective’ on anything?

What’s getting us killed every time, what’s keeping this country from going round and round in circles, unable to punch its way out of this paper bag it’s stuck in, is this: too many people who think they have the right to hold issues of national significance hostage to their particular interests.

It’s what is killing us in the strategic sense, and it’s killing us in the economic arena too. The best laid plans will inevitably come to grief if people don’t get a handle on their emotions, and if people don’t stop holding the national agenda hostage to their particular interests.

The writer is a Karachi-based journalist covering business and economic policy.

Twitter: @khurramhusain

khurram.husain@gmail.com

More From This Section

Afghan election and beyond

IT will indeed be a rare feat for an Afghan ruler to leave office alive and hand over the charge to his elected...

Education guidelines

EDUCATION is the answer for Pakistan, everyone says, and indeed they may be right. At the same time, what counts as...

The CAR is crashing

The Central African Republic remains dysfunctional.

An unequal battle

Data shows the horrific extent to which laws are violated.


Comments are closed.

Comments (12)

osman narejo
May 24, 2012 7:32 am
..........a very good article outlining our failure to grapple with some of the critical issues the nation faces! both the points discussed by the writer relate to our responsibility to deal with public issues which relate to our economic and poltical viability. all of us know that our depend on foreign financial resources stems from our inability to raise enough public revenue in the country. and the opening of supply routes to the NATO provides us a tool to effetively engage with the world to impress upon them the point that our national interest and values are not incompatible with the world. yet, egregious failure on both the issues, instead of helping us to free ourselves from the outside world, further entreches our dependence upon them - the difference is between today and tomorrow!
NASAH (USA)
May 24, 2012 12:51 pm
When you go to a host country to attend a crucial meeting in which almost your entire mentor Western world is invited to deliberate peace in your own backyard -- unprepared and and empty handed -- with no answer for the pressing matters at the meeting -- and your inexperienced ambassador publishes a silly op-ed in the host city paper enumerating a litany of emotional unfriendly demands from the host country -- 18 hours before the start of the meeting -- and when an upstart 20 year old kid in the company of his non-supervising father accuses the president of the host country of 'LACK of COURAGE' and asks him to PERSONALLY apologize for an accident -- what should be in store for such a disorganized, disparate, deconstructive delegation -- but embarrassment?
Dr. Imran Wazir
May 24, 2012 1:10 pm
Don't panic ... just chill! We Pakistani were demanding provincial autonomy ... we got it. Now, more provinces demand ... we will get it. More autonomy will make provincial political representatives more responsible ... In the end ... we all will have Win- Win situation, INSHALLAH. But who will bell the cat? Answer: The evolutionary process will do it ... This is time tested principle ... let the system reach to one extreme.... of pendulum, it has remained stand still for few moments, then it moves in opposite direction.
Dr. Imran Wazir
May 24, 2012 1:14 pm
Don't panic ... just chill!
Agha Ata
May 24, 2012 1:17 pm
Khurram, you said the whole thing when you said: " . . . Then there is the military, fanning the flames of . . ." In the innermost core of the nut of this particular shell is KASHMIR. And Kashmiries who do not even want to join Pakistan anymore. And 15 crores of people who sacrifice the future of their children everyday to feed the army is no more interested in Kashmir either. The whole thing is an obsession with no outcome, downright madness.
raika45
May 24, 2012 1:44 pm
Why is it in both India and Pakistan your people have the uncanny ability to elect people that do not have the future of the nation as a whole but bent on enriching their own interests?They have no iota of feelings for the country regarding the welfare of it's people nor the nation's economic progress.Your people cry and complain and yet every election they send in one way or the other the same morons back into the parliament.
Tariq
May 24, 2012 1:53 pm
I see a fundamental lack of maturity in the Pakistani media. There is very little reasoned debate. The media echo chamber resembles a High School lunch room instead of responsible adults discussing crucial issues. I don't know if it is the Pakistani media reflecting the character of the nation (overly emotional, quick to take offense, holding grudges, thinking everybody is out to get them), or the nation taking its cues from the media. Its the classic chicken or the egg question.
Chan
May 24, 2012 5:00 pm
Sensible Article. Pakistan has to move out of the Military dominance and focus on educating the mass for improve the productivity and GDP. Pakistan should not blame anyone for their plight and keep the religion away from all the politics and economic sphere.
Cyrus Howell
May 24, 2012 5:31 pm
"Nobody is willing to own the consequences." An apt phrase. Mind if I borrow that one? + We must also imagine that with the rupee falling on the money markets that the taxes which are paid now are worth less in paying back international debt. To rescue the situation some people not paying their fair share of taxes will have to pay them or other sources of tax revenue will have to be squeezed out of the people. That would probably mean the price of petrol (as an example) would go higher to pay additional taxes. New sales taxes would have to be levied, and the taxes on imported goods raised. What's the worry for the country? The rich will just put the population back on the rack and stretch their joints until agreement is found. The whole point of being rich is to avoid taxation.
Omair
May 24, 2012 9:03 pm
you nailed it !! i just pray and hope the majority populous understands what you mean.
babar
May 24, 2012 10:35 pm
I beg to differ. No one is naieve or inexperienced not to understand the gravity of situations, it is just that no one is willing to put national interest before thier temporary personal interest.
EQ8Rhomes
May 25, 2012 12:46 am
Where critical thinking is suppressed , emotional, knee-jerk actions and reactions rule. Reason vs emotion --- think.
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page