23 July, 2014 / Ramazan 24, 1435

Of blood and money

Published May 09, 2012 12:10am

SHUMAILA Waseem did not wait to see how the sudden bounty resulting from her husband’s death would transform those around her.

The widow of Faheem Shamshad, one of the two men killed by CIA contractor Raymond Davis in January 2011, committed suicide a scant two weeks after her husband’s death.

She did it by ingesting rat poison, not an instant end but one that permitted her to be taken to hospital and be hounded by hungry reporters. She said she had chosen death because she felt certain that the American man who had killed her husband would never be brought to justice.

As the effects of the rat poison thinned her blood until it could no longer sustain her, Shumaila said she wanted “blood for blood” revenge for her husband’s death. Hearing of her death, millions of Pakistanis saw in her poisoned end their own helplessness before a superpower whose every act mocked their powerlessness.

Zahra Faizan, the widow of Davis’s other victim, Faizan Haider, chose to live. If justice is money, then she saw it delivered. In March 2011, while Pakistan’s masses seethed and bubbled and raged over the killing, a behind-the-scenes deal was worked out and a pardon purchased from the aggrieved family for a reported $2.2m.

According to the Qisas and Diyat Ordinance, it is likely that the deceased Faizan’s father and brothers received a larger portion of the compensation, but his widow was also given a share of the blood money paid by the US government. To escape the public wrath of the Pakistani masses who did not wish to pardon Davis, the young widow and her family set off for Dubai, where money is the only ideology and solace is for sale.

Months later they returned to Pakistan to a new life, in a new house and a new neighbourhood. In the suburb of Johar Town in Lahore’s south, where so many newly and awkwardly rich begin their journeys to middle-class respectability, they settled down.

Insulated by the comforts of cash, the tragedy of the loss of a young husband, a suddenly public life and the intrusive curiosity of millions of Pakistanis invested in the outcome of the case seemed to finally cede as the nation went on to nurse other gripes against the US and began to forget about those that had put a price on a pardon for an unforgivable enemy.

So it seemed, until one evening last month when the same riches that were meant to salve their pain became what destroyed them.

According to family sources that spoke to the media, 24-year-old Zahra’s father, Mohammad Shehzad Butt, ensconced in the grandeur obtained from his daughter’s share of the blood money, learned that his largesse was in jeopardy.

Unbeknownst to her father, but with the help of her mother, Zahra had entered into a secret marriage with a maternal cousin who lived in Dubai.

Like so much else in Pakistan, the exact details and dimensions of the motives behind the murder are murky. What is known for certain is that Butt became mad with anger at the prospect of becoming penniless once his married daughter left with her money to her new husband’s home. He killed his wife Nabila first, shooting her inside the new house.

Trying to escape her father’s murderous rage, Zahra ran out into the street in front of the house. But the streets of Johar Town that had allowed the family to escape poverty did not permit her to dodge death. In the shadow of the mansion bought by tragedy, Zahra was shot by her own father.

The molten material of this latest murder in the Davis saga can be threaded into many theories to adorn Pakistan’s plight before American excesses. Those who opposed the ease with which the family members granted the pardon, persuaded by wads of American dollars, can shrug and write off the murder as the rotten fruit of misbegotten gains. Others, more magnanimous, can note how like so much else, the scalding brunt of the Davis saga was borne entirely by the two widows of the men he killed, one yearning for revenge, the other a victim of it.

Unpadded by the riches providing by forgiveness, Shumaila may have chosen to die because she knew a penniless widow could not eke out an existence in Pakistan. But Zahra’s death proved again that a wealthy widow was in as much danger as an impoverished one. Before justice and after justice, the architecture of helplessness remained intact.

Artificially inserted American money has yielded many more casualties in Pakistan. Days before Zahra’s father killed her, a senior USAID official announced that the number of projects in the country were to be reduced from 150 to 35.

Even though the news came riding the back of a sordidly familiar combination of misunderstandings, it may be the best news to hit Pakistan since the Davis saga.

Like the blood money offered to purchase the pardon of men killed, the aid sent over in exchange for opening supply routes and poking around with aerial drones does far more harm than good.

Much like Zahra’s father, a few lucky souls in Islamabad suddenly drowning in a bounty borne of tragedy and the vagaries of being invested with an uncertain power are goaded into vile acts against their own.

The money paid to Davis’s victims was meant to amend the wrong committed against them. But its consequences ended up creating a new design of exploitation and greed just as grisly as the crime itself.

There are no lessons from the tragedy, only regrets and realisations in the twin deaths of Shumaila and Zahra. The rest of us can only hang our heads in mourning and realise that money, even millions of dollars of it, cannot eliminate the misery of the powerless.

The writer is an attorney teaching political philosophy and constitutional law.

rafia.zakaria@gmail.com

More From This Section

A just war?

Baloch resistance, based on actual grievances, has kept resurfacing.

Comments (11) (Closed)


Laeeq, NY
May 09, 2012 07:21pm
Thats what happened when in Texas , a bus full of children struck by a CocaCola truck and plunged in to a ravine. Many of these children died. Coca cola was sued. Little village suddently became rich. But mney brought with it lot of sins too. They built their dream houses, bough expensive fancy cars and you may guess it. but what happend to thie younger generation. They fall prey to the the drugs, alcohol and other modern age addicitions. Mojority of the people in that town wished that they would never had won the case against the coca cola. They lost one generation to the accident and one generation to the drugs.
aftab alam
May 09, 2012 08:10pm
At the heart of this story is lack of transparency. Remember that Davis did not try to run. There was never any doubt he did it. On the other hand, we never found out who the people were who died, why they were armed, and whether they were following Davis. Perhaps, it was a case of cloak and dagger game gone awry. To paint this case "as powerful against the powerless" is an exercise in pandering, when a far more nuanced view is called for. The dead deserve a voice - this article does the exact opposite.
Mrinal
May 09, 2012 06:22pm
Is is poignant story, one woman without money commits suicide and the other with money is killed and that is the curse of American money in this case.
Syed Ali Raza Shah
May 09, 2012 03:39pm
It is all about shunning double-standards and respecting humanity. Be humane and recognize the value of fundamental human rights for all and sundry. It is not about showcase austerity, it is about valuing life. A nation devoid of humanity has not much of a prospect progressing. As long as we keep hanging on to our false perception of personal ego and pride in our so-called distinct traditions and values, we will keep on doing injustice to ourselves and others.
babar
May 09, 2012 11:43pm
No country, US included, runs a charity for other countries. And rightly so, why should they dole out money from their tax payers to other countries. Every aid, grant, assistance or whatever that is called and however it is made has a price. And the countries getting these aids, loans. grants have to pay that price or return in kind. It seems just fair. I am sure, everyone, particularly those in positions, understand that. They may look so but are not naieve. The only problem is everyone thinks 100% about them and about today only and zero% beyong their own nose or about tomorrow.
Prakash Iyer
May 09, 2012 05:15pm
Very Good!
shakilakhtar
May 09, 2012 06:44am
very sad story. Money is very dangerous, like a sharp knife in the hands of an infant, especially when it is in plenty (our standards) and has been received with ease. Pakistan dies daily at the hands of the west, but we too do our big share.
zafar
May 09, 2012 10:27am
Thank you for writing this. Perhaps Pakistanis value the US dollar too much.
Anuj
May 09, 2012 08:05am
i agree - reject US proposals, allow them to put sanctions, live in penury in the short run come out stronger later is a good idea for Pakistan. The MNAs should immediately act on this premise which the learned writer Rafia is writing about. Self respect and sovereignity need to be regained. All else later.
Shyam
May 09, 2012 10:11am
Why no outrage in this case ? Why no outrage when Talibanis kill Pakistani soldiers ? If Pakistanis can kill Pakistanis with impunity and life has little value - why make a hue and cry when Americans do it ?
S. Arshad Kamal
May 09, 2012 09:05am
Money is the only thing that counts today in Pakistan and people are ready to go to any length to get their hands on money.