03 September, 2014 / Ziqa'ad 7, 1435

Siachen reminder

Published Apr 17, 2012 12:00am

THERE is little reason why a Pakistani tragedy in Siachen should prompt the Indian government to seek a settlement on the icy heights — unless wiser counsel prevails. A ‘comprehensive settlement’ was pledged in the 1989 joint statement signed by the then Pakistani and Indian defence secretaries on June 17 as a result of back-channel diplomacy when Benazir Bhutto and Rajiv Gandhi were prime ministers. The agreement, which a senior Pakistan Foreign Office official recently asked India to honour, has remained a piece of paper for more than two decades. It is unlikely to be translated into an international treaty because the security establishments of both countries have frustrated attempts by their civilian leaderships to end the conflict on the world’s highest battlefield. At the moment, Indian generals think their troops are in a strategically advantageous position. A pullback to the 1984 positions, before fighting began in Siachen, would in their opinion deprive the Indian army of the operational advantage it enjoys at present. If there is a pullback, the Indian side insists, the existing positions must be marked on maps and ground.

Pakistan’s position is simpler: let the two sides withdraw to the 1984 positions and pledge to turn the glacier into a demilitarised zone. There are reasons to believe that many Indian governments wanted to clinch an agreement on Siachen but were frustrated by their defence establishment. Essentially, it is for the Manmohan Singh government to put its foot down and end a conflict in which more men have died from harsh climatic conditions than in actual combat. A Siachen settlement will have a positive effect on the overall relationship between Pakistan and India and quicken the pace of normalisation.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Continuing impunity

THOUGH civil society and all those in Pakistan who favour the rule of law have been campaigning hard for an end to...

Thar drought

THE Thar region is once again in the news for the drought and starvation that are taking their toll on the...

Comments (8) (Closed)


Fahad Hashmi
Apr 17, 2012 01:59pm
it just seems to be ego-effort for both countries to deploy armed forces at such high altitude; logically there is no reason to keep soldiers there, in extremely tough living conditions. both countries should think to remove their forces and engage them in place where actually they should be.
Faisal
Apr 17, 2012 03:04pm
I don't know about others but at least pakistan and india can not solve all such issues by mutual cooperation.
Gibson
Apr 18, 2012 02:51am
Dawn Editorial states "Pakistan’s position is simpler: let the two sides withdraw to the 1984 positions and pledge to turn the glacier into a demilitarized zone." If this statement is true, why Pakistan is unwilling to agree and mark existing positions on maps and ground?
Nanji
Apr 17, 2012 09:59pm
Peace ? But at what terms ? Indian would never draw back from siachen. Its at the tri junction of Indo Pak and China. Pakistan will never stop attempting to recapture it. At the end the glacier would melt altogether and rivers from it gone.
Afzal Mahmood
Apr 17, 2012 11:44am
Oh its so bad and horrible. Let there be a bit of sense on both sides and may spend, what they spend on icy land, on things essential for peace rather than for a prepetual war like situation which yields no results
Daniel
Apr 17, 2012 10:16pm
Pakistan's demand that India retreat to the pre-1984 position is in accordance with the maps underlying the founding of the states of India and Pakistan. Indian occupation of Siachen in a nocturnal clandestine operation is a violation of Pakistan's territorial sovereignty and a violated country must not 'compensate' the usurper. Demanding a compensation is outright bullying.
Shankar
Apr 17, 2012 02:03pm
Everybody admits that India has a tactical advantage today and by withdrawing to pre 1984 positions they will lose it. If that is so how is this a just proposal? I know we will stop loss of young lives here, but there needs to b a quid pro quo. What can Pakistan do to compensate?
nirmal maunder
Apr 17, 2012 08:30pm
Realistically speaking,U cant get at the table what u have lost in the field.