Anti-Americanism is one of the most overtly used marketing ploys of various political outfits in Pakistan. Once the sole fixation of radical left-wing groups and student organisations (NSF, DSF, BSO), and of progressive mainstream parties such as the PPP, NAP/ANP and others (especially during the Cold War), anti-American rhetoric and posturing began to be adopted by conservative political parties and Islamist outfits after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Ever since the late 1990s, or more so, after the 2001 terrorist attacks by Al-Qaeda on American soil (9/11), it was those conservative and religious groups in Pakistan which had sided with the US during its Cold War against the Soviets that became most vocal bearers of anti-Americanism in Pakistan. Now that American patronage (and dollars) had been diverted to forces opposed to Islamists and conservatives, such forces once allied to the US steadily became vehemently anti-American.

However, it wasn’t until the strengthening of anti-American sections within the country’s armed forces and intelligence agencies during this period that the bludgeoning new electronic media uncannily became the populist mouthpiece of these sections.

Consequently it helped turn the post-9/11 anti-Americanism in Pakistan into a widespread and largely knee-jerk social reaction.

But as the more militant and violent expressions of this new-found anti-Americanism in the shape of jihadist and sectarian outfits failed to gather much sympathy from most Pakistanis. In fact, a gradual sense of repulsion against these outfits began to emerge — mainstream conservative parties such as the PML-N, Jamat-i-Islami (JI) and eventually the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) jumped in to ride the anti-American wave sweeping across Pakistan.

This was the period when Army Chief General Kayani was in the process of successfully repairing the image of the military that was battered during the Musharraf dictatorship. However, clearly lacking in Kayani’s agenda was the reigning in of the country’s intelligence agencies and those sections of the armed forces that were now using anti-Americanism as a bargaining chip with the Americans who were attempting to shift at least some of their focus and funds in propping up a receptive democratic government and civilian projects.

The whole hue and cry about the Kerry-Lugar Bill in 2009 is a case in point in which not only conservative and Islamist parties were used to destabilise a so-called anti-military and ‘pro-American’ civilian setup, but sympathetic TV news anchors, newspaper reporters and columnists were also allegedly brought into play by the politicised pockets operating freely within the country’s intelligence agencies and the military. But as these agencies and the military began to stumble from one embarrassing episode of incompetence and interference after another (Raymond Davis, OBL killing, the reopening of Mehrangate scandal, etc.), the electronic media began to willingly spin out of the orbit of the military/ISI-backed rhetoric and sentiment. What was left at the agencies’ disposal were the staunchest buyers of the said spiel in the media (many of whom have now been facing declining ratings and reputation), and Islamist political outfits that have been loitering outside parliament.

Also coming into this loop was the rising ‘third force,’ Imran Khan’s PTI, that, at least before it actually began sensing itself as a mainstream political force (as opposed to the charismatic installment in the local lunatic fringe), was clearly given a helping hand by the agencies to help them keep their sullied game with the Americans going. But as PTI learns more and more about the nitty-gritty of Pakistan’s electoral politics in which anti-Americanism may get you cheers but not votes, there is a likelihood that the staunchly pro-establishment PTI too will eventually break away from its dappled benefactors’ orbit.

This is why anti-Americanism as a political positioning in Pakistan today is being competed for mostly by old-school Islamic parties such as the JI and the JUI-F on the one hand and by new right-wing entrants in Pakistan’s evolving electoral scene such as the sectarian Jamatud Dawa (JuD), the Salafist Difa-e-Pakistan Council (DePC), and the Barelvi-oriented Pakistan Sunni Tehreek (PST).

The DePC and the JI are close to the country’s military-establishment, but it is interesting to note that ever since late 2011, Islamist outfits of all shades have decided to prove themselves to be the most committed opponents of the American drone attacks and of the resumption of Nato supplies from Pakistan. It is interesting because nearly all of these outfits have serious sub-sectarian differences amongst them. They may now be organising to get themselves voted into parliament, but their programmes lack what is required to get the voters to vote for them.

That is why PTI, JUI-F and PST have now wisely decided to pad their anti-Americanism with calls for an ‘Islamic welfare state’ (in varying degrees) but JI and DePC seem to be content mouthing a ubiquitous and empty anti-American/pro-establishment idiom that can hardly garner any serious voter interest. The most interesting is the emergence of the Shia platform, the Majlis-i-Wahdat-e-Muslimeen (MWeM). Constantly harassed and targeted by their Salafi counterparts, Shias finally managed to hold a large religious gathering in Karachi to protest against what many of the MWeM’s leaders assert are the unrelenting murders of Pakistan’s Shias at the hands of the ‘establishment-backed Salafi/Deobandi jihadist outfits.’

The odd thing about this rally was that even during this gathering aimed at Salafi groups and the establishment, many Shia leaders did not miss the opportunity to attack the United States and Nato! This further confirms the fact that anti-Americanism, at least as a political ploy, is now squarely a narrow ruse of Islamic parties and groups of varying sects and sub-sects in Pakistan.

The mainstream political parties are now concentrating more on economic and social issues, rightly conscious of the fact that these are what get the most attention from the voters.

More From This Section

Afghan election and beyond

IT will indeed be a rare feat for an Afghan ruler to leave office alive and hand over the charge to his elected...

Education guidelines

EDUCATION is the answer for Pakistan, everyone says, and indeed they may be right. At the same time, what counts as...

The CAR is crashing

The Central African Republic remains dysfunctional.

An unequal battle

Data shows the horrific extent to which laws are violated.


Comments are closed.

Comments (12)

Odhano
April 1, 2012 5:24 pm
Brilliant NFP! Yours is among a few sane voices left in Pakistan. Keep writing and people with a seeking and sound mind will eventually realize what actually is in the profound national interest.
Shakoor Alam
April 1, 2012 7:49 pm
A really good piece of writing,narrating the facts.Particularly the present alliance of so called religious parties/jihadi groups aka 'Defa-e-Pakistan Council'and Military.Nobody can forget the Musharaf regime's notorious puppets MMA (Mullah-Military Alliance).
Afzal khan
April 1, 2012 8:13 pm
NFP Nice.My question from the so called DPC PTI and JI is that why they were silent from the last ten years on supply to NATO and now they are making much fuss on the resumption of supply ? a million dollor question.
Umer Rasheed
April 1, 2012 8:53 pm
Dear NFP, I was wondering if you could elaborate a little bit on how you came up with "..staunchy pro-establishment PTI too will break away.." I fail to understand how from being a music critic you have transformed into a champion of current affairs/ political analysis (probably because politics sells more than music nowadays). I see you have turned your guns towards IK and PTI since the demise of red-capped so-called defence analyst. Is defying the popular opinion the best you could do? This is an over-used cheap shot at publicity.
haider shaikh
April 1, 2012 8:53 pm
i beg to disagree with the writer that mainstream parties are focussing on social and economic issues. i think they don't have any agenda. Had it been so, the energy crisis would have been under control now. It seems they just have one agenda that is how to get and stay in the power. That's it.
Devendra
April 1, 2012 9:04 pm
Well said, Odhano. Couldn't have said any better myself. I am an avid reader and an admirer of NFP for his deep understanding of realities of Pakistan, his fearless articles telling it like it is, his analytical mind and integrity. NFP is not only credit to Pakistan but to the whole journalistic community worldwide. GO NFP!!!
Mustafa
April 1, 2012 9:23 pm
I confess I as dead wrong about expertise of Nadeem Pracha as journalist/writer believing he only writes jokes until I read this excellent article that is an eye opener and speaks the truth. Congratulations Nadeem.
BRR
April 1, 2012 9:25 pm
How silly, and to some extent disgusting, it seems when Pakistani writers and politicians use phrases such as "supreme national interest", "profound national interest". Such senseless mouthing of words! Slogans misused so many times, and overused, that they have lost all meaning.
Ashfaq Khan
April 1, 2012 10:14 pm
Very interesting; analysis par excellence
SA
April 2, 2012 3:05 am
So when you are not drawing cartoons or being sarcastic, you make sense ie. your plain talking makes sense and I find mysefl agreeing with you.
Zohaib
April 3, 2012 9:40 pm
Exactly. They pretend like they care about social and economic issues but all they're really trying to do is just stay in power
Aysha Anas Iftikhar
April 11, 2012 10:49 pm
NFP your are gifted writer.I'd like to read about topics other than Marxisim,Zia-ul-haq,JI and the Mullah.Hoping to read about themes othes than the above
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page