APC on Balochistan

Published Feb 16, 2012 11:40pm

HERE we go again. Another ‘all-party conference’ on Balochistan has been mooted, this time by the prime minister, who on Wednesday suggested that the APC would be held “as soon as possible”, this after a meeting with the foreign minister, COAS and ISI chief to discuss the security situation.

Last month, it was Nawaz Sharif who pledged to convene an APC of his own, and the government had immediately suggested it was willing to participate. Will the two APCs now be merged? It doesn’t really matter, for as long as the enormous gap between the rhetoric of politicians and the realities of Balochistan remains, the politicians are unlikely to lead the way to a solution in the violence-torn province. What are those realities? They’re fairly well known by now. Violence by both sides is up. The so-called ‘kill and dump’ policy of extrajudicial executions has claimed nearly 300 lives so far. Meanwhile, the Baloch separatists continue their campaign of violence, targeting both security installations and personnel as well as ordinary non-Baloch residents of the province.

In fact, a troubling new development is the targeting of Pakhtuns, in this case seven newly arrived labourers in southwest Balochistan, presumably by Baloch separatists. Until now, it had been the Punjabi ‘settlers’ who had been the subject of violence. Their killing was seen as a way of protesting Punjab’s ‘domination’ of the federation, and the Baloch in particular. Unfortunately for the Punjabi settlers, they were relatively soft targets. But the killing of Pakhtun labourers could have serious consequences for Balochistan given the significant Pakhtun population in the province and the long-standing demand of some Pakhtun leaders that the northern parts of the province, even Quetta city, be merged with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Whether the Baloch separatists have opened a new front in the province out of desperation or as a way of drawing fresh attention to their cause, the implications are terrifying. Baloch and Pakhtun leaders must reassert the importance of peaceful coexistence.

As for the APC, in theory it is a good idea but in practice will only work if the politicians are serious about bringing the warring sides, the Baloch separatists and the security establishment, to the table. A recent background briefing on Balochistan by senior security officials reflected how difficult that task is: the blame was almost wholly cast on politicians for putting self-interest ahead of the needs of the province. Of course, that perspective is questionable, if not problematic: as long as bribes and bullets are the preferred instruments of the security establishment for dealing with Balochistan, the province will never truly escape its unhappy past and present.

More From This Section

Sectarian killings

Promises have lost their purpose because nobody believes them now and because they have not been accompanied by a plan.

Cashing in on Eid

Last year, the amount printed was Rs135bn. The year before it was Rs114bn. This year the amount is more than Rs157bn

Comments (2) (Closed)


abasin khan
Feb 17, 2012 06:09pm
it is referring to the editorial written today, in which it was discussed Baluchistan issue. We pashtuns do not agree with opinion given the paper about Pashtuns and Baloch. As it was stated that "the said two nations must reassert the importance of peaceful coexistence". For your information not some Pashtuns leaders, but entire Pashtuns adhere to parity between Pashtuns and Baloch or want to be part of Khyber Pashtoonkhwa. Pashtuns and Baloch have been separated into different administrative units till 1970. Baloch were in Kalat state while Pashtuns were under the guise of Chief commissioner' province. With the bifurcation of one unit, they were emerged as in one province named Baluchistan. The imminent and so called APC must discuss Pashtuns and Baloch issue. Specially DAWN newspaper must arise the above mentioned issue.
Jaihoon
Feb 18, 2012 12:46am
Balochs' struggle for nationhood and national liberation is certain to succeed; and that, Baloch and Pakhtuns are united in a spirit of armed solidarity.