The Axis of Evil – 10 years on

Published Sep 05, 2011 05:38pm

It’s nearly a decade since President Bush first used the term Axis of Evil to describe Iran, Iraq and North Korea. So widely reported, it provoked a flurry of other axes. A couple of months later, US diplomat, John Bolton tagged on Libya, Syria and Cuba to the mix in his “Beyond the Axis of Evil” speech. It took a few more years for Condoleezza Rice to further embellish the list with her own self styled Outposts of Tyranny; identifying Cuba, Belarus, Zimbabwe, Iran, North Korea and Mynmar as culprits. 

Tyranny and evil are perhaps not the most sophisticated diplomatic language.  I couldn’t help wondering how these terrible countries had faired in US relations over the past decade, and where the rhetoric of “evil” has lead us.

Iraq

Iraq was missing from Condoleezza’s 2005 list. As Bush said, “some governments will be timid in the face of tyranny. If they do not act, America will” – he was true to his word on Iraq, although of course no weapons of mass destruction were ever found in Iraq, perhaps undermining the whole axis thing.

Iran

Perhaps because of Iraq, Iran was never really tackled in the same way as was threatened in the speech (sharp eyed commentators may identify a catalogue of other reasons). The US still have a trade embargo on Iran (since 1995) and have had no real diplomatic relations for 30 years (although Iran does have an office in the Pakistani Embassy in Washington). At the beginning of his presidency Obama tried to reach out the Iranian people by appealing directly to them for a new beginning, but several years on, and the Americans and many other nations still have concerns about nuclear development (promulgated by Wikileaks – who themselves have been called evil and are the target of US "aggressive steps"). Earlier this year, US Secretary of State Clinton did however label Iran “awful” in a speech about internet freedoms and allegations that they have been helping Syria (who I will get on to in a minute) haven’t helped.

North Korea

Like Iran, the US has no diplomatic relations with North Korea. They have been accused of forging US bank notes and their nuclear development and testing continues to concern more than just the USA. There have been glimmers of hope – four years ago the US navy rescued a group of North Korean sailors from Somali pirates and two years ago Clinton (Bill this time) negotiated the release of two American journalists. On a more macro level, in 2009 North Korea was removed from the “Sponsors of State Terrorism” list (yes another list for another time). Extensive Googling has not revealed a single mention of North Korea as evil or awful, however when examining US-North Korean relations, I cannot help but think of a masterful piece of cultural diplomacy – one of my favourite films – Team America.

Libya, Syria and Cuba

America and the world appeared to tolerate Qadhafi as a naughty dictator until very recently, when he swiftly became a “tyrant” (although missing from Condoleezza’s list of them). Obama has recently called the situation in Libya “fluid”. Syria, is a bit clearer – their revolution is not quite as advanced as Libya’s at the time of writing and although there was an omission of the “e” word in Obama’s recent statement, he did mention the “brutality” of the Syrian regime no less than four times (a former speech-writer winces). The BBC has provided a wonderful summary of US-Cuban relations for me – culminating in a visit from a ballet theatre – the cutting edge of cultural diplomacy. The US State Department give a rather sanitised version of their relationship with Cuba, no mention of the word “evil” at all, and in an interview with Clinton last year she appeared simply “very sad” at the state of their relations. 

Not forgetting Belarus, Zimbabwe and Myanmar

Lastly I turn to Condolleeza’s remaining Outposts of Tyranny: Zimbabwe: Belarus; and Myanmar all labeled “fear societies” by her. Zimbabwe you would think would be easy – years later, the internet is still full of commentators suggesting that Mugabe is “evil” and any hopes the US held in the Copenhagen Statement have slid away. Earlier this year, the publishing of a Human Rights Report on Zimbabwe on State Department’s website sends a clear message about how the US feels, without “actually saying it”. But Belarus? The US still seems to have beef about it being undemocratic…hesitant about it’s links to Syria and it openly supports anti-Lushenko organisations. But evil? All Clinton said a few months ago in Lithuania was that we should show solidarity with those in the streets of Belarus and Libya. The same goes for Myanmar (which both Clinton and Condoleezza refer to as Burma) – after holding several meetings in recent years, the rhetoric on the country is all about “supporting a unified, peaceful, prosperous, and democratic Burma that respects the human rights of its citizens”. Not a tyrant or a scent of evil in the air.

Conclusion

It seems there is a US foreign policy preference for slightly more subtle diplomatic language. (Although Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech in 2009 ironically contained threats of physical violence AND uses the “e” word). So I suggest some adjectives based on the above for the original Axis of Evil:  Iraq = no longer evil (and perhaps never really was); Iran = status changed from “evil” to “awful”; North Korea = erm…”so ronery”? It’s worth mentioning an update on John Bolton’s evil list (even if he does work for Fox News now): Libya = fluid; Syria = brutal; Cuba = sad. And finally a new take on Condi’s adage: Zimbabwe = everyone else says he’s evil; and Belarus/ Myanmar = we support others who say they are evil.

Afghanistan and Pakistan

Of course there are many more candidates for evil. Afghanistan wasn’t on Bush’s 2002 list, perhaps because three months earlier he had already bombed the country and had dispossessed the Taliban regime. But since he frequently referred to the Taliban as “evil-doers”; given that the US is now “talking to the Taliban” and planning on leaving the place, I think we can safely say, it is NOT evil.

Pakistan was not on the list, and the mention of Pakistan in Bush’s speech as on of the “many nations acting forcefully” was met with applause. And the US have been at pains to express their “special relationship” with Pakistan since, whilst at the same time bombing the baddies in its territories. There was one Pakistani who dared to refer to the USA as the “Axis of Evil”. It was retired army General, Hamid Gul – but his statement was undermined by the fact that perhaps you need three countries to make up an axis. I guess “outpost” may not have had the same effect.

Creative evil

If you have got this far in the article, well done. Perhaps you could help me with a little research?  I have an interest in perceptions of places (especially how they are presented in the media). If you have a spare five minutes please click through to my “Axis of Evil” questionnaire. I am hoping to turn it into an art piece – perhaps even write about the results here. I hope you are comforted that such undiplomatic language can allow artists and writers to embellish “evil” for themselves. Christine Fair’s excellent political cook-book Cuisines of The Axis of Evil and the Axis of Evil comedy tour,  two cases in point.

Caroline Jaine is a UK based writer, artist and film-maker with a background in media strategy, training and diplomacy. Her book A Better Basra, about her time in Iraq was published in August 2011. More about Caroline’s work and her contact details can be found on www.jaine.info and facebook.

 

The views expressed by this blogger and in the following reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.


Caroline Jaine is a UK based writer, artist and film-maker with a background in media strategy, training and international relations. Her main research interests are in the perception of places and people as presented in the media. Her book A Better Basra, about her time in Iraq was published in August 2011.


The views expressed by this blogger and in the following reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.

More From This Author

Comments (10) (Closed)


Khalil Qureshi
Sep 05, 2011 03:57pm
What about USA and NATO countries. Probably the Biggest axis of evil World have ever seen.
Akhter
Sep 05, 2011 06:23pm
Its all about power, otherwise there are much reasons for calling them Sponsor of Evil than we see in the said countries.
naved
Sep 05, 2011 08:21pm
Who has given the right to US to claim who is on axis of evil, the history will repeat itself. Soon others will do the same and the US will find itself on the other end
Sammy Wiseguy
Sep 05, 2011 10:35pm
I don't think there is an axis. There was always a circle. Like from 'meet the parents' Robert de Niro's character has a circle of trust, they have the circle of evil and this circle inter wines with various other circles
Mustafa
Sep 06, 2011 12:10am
Dear Caroline Jaine Who cares what President Bush said with regards to who are “Axis of evils”. Majority of Americans did not like policies of President Bush. America has now a President who is not only liked by majority of Americans but also majority of people in the world. Let us not paint America with the brush of George Bush to present distorted image of America which will remain a powerful nation and play a leading role to maintain peace in the world.
Paddy Singh
Sep 06, 2011 02:39am
There are countries and governments that can be considered being among the Axis of Evil lot, but ask one question - who created them?
Shakeel.Quddus
Sep 06, 2011 08:17am
A poet like T.S.Eliot wonders: "I sometimes wonder if that is what Krishna meant--Among other things or one way of putting the same thing: That the future is a faded song or a lavender spray. Of wistful regret for those who are not yet here to regret." After the liquidation of the "Evil empire" in 1989, with millions of dead littered over the Eurasian landscape, the late senator Mr. Monyhan of New York wondered if such an event could be looked upon as a passing regret. He, a democrat rather than a conservative republican, was able to foresee new surprises in the form of evil. Soon he was to confront a disaster in the very city he had represented. Then arrived the era of suicide bombings and random violence. Later mafia-like dictatorships began to crumble with violence of new kinds. There are sights of human remains in hundreds left in haste with a sign of massacre. All this in the major news magazines. Is there a difference between those who were butchered coldbloodedly under the communist ideology and those who were massacred in Tripoli under the decaying one man rule? Evil is evil and everybody recognizes when seen except the intellectual, from a safe distance, would rather choose other word for his aesthetic sensibilities. We are surrounded by evil and march daily with a death like indifference. The problem is our indifference towards evil and not in the definition of evil.
Sharma Anil
Sep 06, 2011 11:19am
The funniest thing happened in the near time is the Nobel Peace Prize for Obama. Did he contribute anything ouststanding to promote world peace ? He keeps on telling pulling out from various war-comic staged in the middle-east; if at all that happens, it is because of a failing US economy and out of compulsion.
Sandeep
Sep 06, 2011 11:43am
Countries are not evil but the people are. And the are everywhere. Evil has no boundary......
Rafay321
Sep 06, 2011 06:30pm
Isn't USA the "Center of Evil"?