ISLAMABAD, Oct 6: The Supreme Court was told here on Monday that the rules framed by the previous Punjab government through a notification, which authorised it to acquire lands in the picturesque village of Salkhaiter, were exclusively meant to benefit a private estate developer to build ‘Bahria Golf City’.

On a suo motu, a three-member bench comprising Chief Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar, Justice Ijazul Hassan and Justice Chaudhry Ejaz Yousaf had taken up a mercy petition regarding the plight of families living in Salkhaiter whose land is being allegedly acquired by the Punjab authorities forcibly to develop a project by Bahria Town.

“These rules were not only inconsistent with the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001 but also in conflict with Articles 2A (Objective Resolution to form part of the government), 4 (Right of individual to be dealt in accordance with the law), 9 (security of person) and 26 (non-discrimination in respect of access to public places),” Advocate Shafqat Abbasi argued before the bench while representing the affected people of Salkhaiter, located at the foot of Murree Hills some 15km from the Rawal Dam.

Advocate S.M. Zafar and Ashtar Ausaf represented Bahria Town.

Before the proclamation of emergency and subsequent removal of the apex court judges, a five-member bench headed by now deposed Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry had stayed the acquisition of land by the Punjab government for the private-sector development scheme.

Shafqat Abbasi told Dawn that he informed the court that the approval of the Tehsil Municipal Administration (TMA) Murree, a necessary ingredient in developing any project in the area, was missing and so was the public notice by the scrutiny committee of public officers, the job of which was to invite public objections to the project.

Citing the 1994 Supreme Court’s Shehla Zia case, Mr Abbasi requested the court to seek for an expert opinion from professional bodies like the Capital Development Authority (CDA), International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), National Engineering Services Pakistan (Nespak) or WWF.

According to him, the project was being developed without conducting its environment impact assessment under Section 12 of the Pakistan Environment Protection Act (Pepa) 1997 and alleged that the project could pollute Nullah Korang, a main source of Rawal Dam, the contamination of which could put at risk the health of the citizens.

Salkhaiter is home to over 250 families living in nearly 1,000 houses. According to the villagers, the land was inherited and more than 1,500 individuals depend on the little agricultural produce obtained from fields on the outskirts of the settlement.

In their application to the Supreme Court, the affected residents of the area had accused the Bahria Town proprietors of “forcefully taking over some 659 kanals of land of their forefathers.”

Opinion

Editorial

Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...
By-election trends
Updated 23 Apr, 2024

By-election trends

Unless the culture of violence and rigging is rooted out, the credibility of the electoral process in Pakistan will continue to remain under a cloud.
Privatising PIA
23 Apr, 2024

Privatising PIA

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb’s reaffirmation that the process of disinvestment of the loss-making national...
Suffering in captivity
23 Apr, 2024

Suffering in captivity

YET another animal — a lioness — is critically ill at the Karachi Zoo. The feline, emaciated and barely able to...