IHC to announce decision on Nawaz’s plea on 25th

Published February 23, 2019
Ex-premier Nawaz Sharif is seeking release on medical grounds in Al-Azizia reference. — DawnNewsTV
Ex-premier Nawaz Sharif is seeking release on medical grounds in Al-Azizia reference. — DawnNewsTV

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court will announce on Feb 25 its decision on a petition seeking release of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif on bail on medical grounds.

An IHC bench comprising Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani will announce the decision in the open court.

The bench had on Wednesday reserved the decision on the petition seeking the suspension of seven-year sentence awarded to Mr Sharif in the Al-Azizia reference.

In his concluding arguments, lead defence counsel Khawaja Haris Ahmed argued before the court that successive medical boards were of the view that Mr Sharif was suffering from multiple diseases and they recommended his further medical investigation and examination.

He said that doctors were not taking any responsibility of Mr Sharif’s treatment and this was the reason that since the middle of January, six different medical boards had been constituted to examine his health condition.

Ex-premier is seeking release on medical grounds in Al-Azizia reference

According to the counsel, it is was the fundamental right of Mr Sharif to get medical treatment from the doctor and the hospital of his choice.

He said that Mr Sharif was suffering from issues related to kidney, hypertension and diabetes, besides having cardiac problems.

The counsel told the court that the findings of the successive medical boards were consistent and none of these reports contradicted the petitioner’s stance.

He said that the report of a medical board had even suggested that Mr Sharif should undergo angiography, adding that in a previous angiography it was found that he was suffering from multiple complications that had led to his surgery.

He requested the court to suspend the sentence of Mr Sharif, enabling him to get timely treatment from the doctor of his choice.

The additional prosecutor general of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Jahanzeb Bharwana, on the other hand, opposed the suspension of the sentence, saying that the medical reports did not raise any apprehension that the life of Mr Sharif was in danger while being imprisoned.

He argued that the Supreme Court had in various cases, including the NAB’s appeal against the suspension of Mr Sharif’s sentence in the Avenfield properties reference, outlined criteria according to which the high court could not grant bail to any convict under such circumstances.

Published in Dawn, February 23rd, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.