ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Tuesday filed its second counter-memorial in the Indian spy Kulbhushan Jadhav case in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) at The Hague.

“Pakistan has submitted its second reply at ICJ today in the case of Indian spy and terrorist, Commander Jadhav,” Foreign Office spokesman Dr Mohammad Faisal said here.

Dr Fareha Bugti, a Foreign Ministry official serving on the India desk, submitted the dossier at the ICJ. She was accompanied by Hague-based Pakistani diplomat Waseem Shahzad.

With the filing of the counter-memorial by Pakistan, the process of written submissions in the case by both parties (India and Pakistan) has completed, a diplomatic source said. The case is now ready for oral proceedings.

The voluminous 400-page written pleading submitted by Pakistan argues that the Vienna Convention is not applicable in the case of Jadhav, who is a commissioned officer in Indian Navy and was serving with spy agency RAW at the time of his capture in Pakistan in March 2016.

Jadhav was later sentenced to death in 2017 by a military tribunal for his involvement in espionage. His appeals against the conviction have been rejected by the military appellate court and the mercy petition is pending with Army Chief Gen Qamar Bajwa.

India had approached the ICJ against Pakistan for allegedly violating Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations by denying consular access to Jadhav immediately after his capture. Pakistan had last December hosted Jadhav’s meeting with his wife and mother as a humanitarian gesture.

The court had soon after accepting the Indian petition held a single round of oral hearings following which the Pakistan government was restrained from executing Jadhav till its final verdict in the case. Two rounds of written submissions by both parties followed.

It is expected that the hearings would commence next year depending on the court’s calendar. The diplomatic source said the ICJ had already announced its schedule for this year. The source expected that the court could give its verdict next year at the end of oral submissions.

Published in Dawn, July 18th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.