The Supreme Court on Tuesday proceeded on its suo motu notice of 'unreasonable' deductions made from consumers' mobile top-ups on the pretext of withholding taxes and other charges.

During the proceedings, the attorney general informed the court that mobile companies deduct 19.5 per cent as sales tax, 10pc as service charges and 12.5pc as withholding tax on mobile top-up cards.

He further informed the court that these taxes were not applicable on services used by the government and diplomats.

"Why is withholding tax charged [on mobile top-ups]? Isn't withholding tax charged in order to penalise those who otherwise do not pay applicable taxes?" Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar asked. "Isn't double taxing illegal?" the chief justice separately inquired.

"How are they charging withholding tax from 140 million mobile service subscribers who are not eligible to pay taxes?" he continued, at which Justice Umar Ata Bandial remarked that it seemed like "an unlawful way to coax money out of people's hands."

"How are those people who are not eligible to pay taxes supposed to get their deducted withholding tax refunded?" the chief justice wondered.

"[Also] tell us the law under which sales tax is charged from people," the chief justice asked, to which a lawyer present in court pointed out that people living in Islamabad are required to pay 17pc as sales tax while those in the provinces are paying 19pc.

"The FBR and the provincial governments should tell the court under which law this [provincial] sales tax is applicable," the chief justice said.

The bench subsequently asked for a chart that can show the taxes paid by mobile phone users in countries all over the world.

The federal and provincial government and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) were also ordered to submit written replies to the court's questions within a week.

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.