ISLAMABAD: More than a year since issuing notices to the Pakistanis mentioned in the Panama Papers, the country’s tax officials are losing hope of obtaining information about the money used to buy assets abroad.

In September 2016, the intelligence directorate of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) issued 344 notices to owners of the offshore companies mentioned in the Pan­ama Papers but the tax officials received a very poor response.

The poor response has discouraged the tax officials so much that they have not opted to issue any notices to those named in the recently revealed Paradise Papers. The officials feel that such revelations make good headlines but hardly provide sufficient grounds for the authorities to tax people.

Notices sent over one year ago get poor response

A separate office was established at the FBR headquarters to collect information regarding the notices sent to owners of offshore companies.

Official data show that show-cause notices mentioning penalties have been issued only to 10 persons in the one year since emergence of the Panama Papers. This shows that owing to several reasons the compliance is negligible.

In the first show-cause notice, the penalty mentioned stood at Rs25,000 as per the income tax ordinance.

Data available with Dawn show that only 72 persons confirmed their ownership of offshore companies. However, they did not admit to their assets.

Twelve individuals were reported to be dead in the responses received from their widows. As many as 55 persons denied that they had links with the offshore companies.

Eighty-four notices could not be delivered on the addresses mentioned in the Panama Papers. However, the tax department is in correspondence with 57 individuals.

Fifty-four individuals replied that they did not fall under the jurisdiction of the Pakistani tax authorities because they were non-resident Pakistanis.

An official said the Panama Papers experience had shown that leaks only helped in identifying the names of certain people. The challenge before the FBR was to obtain details of the assets accumulated by such people, which were not shared in documents like the Panama Papers.

During investigations it was found that an offshore company was established in the name of a watchman. He was shocked to know that he owned an offshore company, the official said.

“We can’t get anything out of these notices,” the official said, adding that the only option before the department was to get information from the Orga­nisation for Economic Coo­peration and Dev­elop­ment’s mul­t­­ilateral mechanism rega­rding the exchange of information on assets.

Last year the FBR sent letters to nine tax havens — the British Virgin Islands, Bahamas, Panama, Seyc­helles, Niue, Samoa, Mau­ritius, Anguilla and Jersey — asking them to share details of the assets owned by the people named in the leaks. But it did not get any positive response.

A senior official said nothing would come out of such leaks until Pakistan entered into treaties about avoidance of double taxation.

Published in Dawn, November 19th, 2017

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.