Sinister options

Published July 28, 2016
The writer is an art historian.
The writer is an art historian.

ONE hopes that there will never be a time again when summer temperatures soar to the sizzling sixties across the globe. Unfortunately, they will. Al Gore was right. His apprehension of global warming — showcased in his Academy Award winning film An Inconvenient Truth (2006) — was not personal paranoia. Then, he was dismissed as an eccentric by smug scientists and armchair sceptics. Global warming, as we are learning to our discomfort, is not a one-off phenomenon: it is an unbearable reality. The world is getting hotter — climatically, and also by osmosis politically.

One hopes too that there will never again be a fortnight in international politics as disturbing and disquieting as what the world experienced recently. But there will be, for turmoil under the heavens has descended on earth, never to ascend.

In most countries a referendum is usually called to decide constitutional amendments. Great Britain, bereft of a written constitution, felt bound to implement the masochistic results of its Brexit referendum. One prime minister fell, another replaced him. To the surprise of many, especially victims of his unsparing tongue, Boris Johnson was appointed by Theresa May as her foreign secretary, in the hope that on the job he will learn that “tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy”.

In the United States, another flaxen extrovert Donald Trump has been formally confirmed as the Republican candidate for the US presidential elections in November 2016. To many, Trump is no more than a bleached Hugh Hefner, surrounded by a bevy of Playboy bunny blondes (a few of them his wives). Trump’s unstoppable luck may well fulfil Will Roger’s frightening wise-crack that “a fool and his money are soon elected”.


Turmoil under the heavens has descended on earth.


His Democrat opponent Hillary Clinton (once a Republican) has a belated shot at becoming president — a hope she denied herself when she subordinated her ambitions to the presidential aspirations of her husband Bill Clinton. Her record as secretary of state complements the skills of her running mate Tim Kaine who speaks fluent Spanish. Together they plan to target the Hispanic, gender, Afro-American and minority votes she hopes will propel her into the White House.

If she should succeed, that would create an unprecedented gender divide in geo-politics — Hillary Clinton in the US, Theresa May in the UK and Angela Merkel in Germany, facing Putin in Russia, Xi Jinping in China, and Narendra Modi in India. Handbags in the West: holsters in the East.

The Cold War, like a revival of some Broadway musical, has been re-scripted, performed by a new cast of state and non-state players. Gone is the innocent conviction Dr Henry Kissinger once held, that only the US has “the capacity to bring about order, to expand prosperity and to preserve the peace” across the world. His Vietnam and Cambodia have spawned half a hundred failed conflicts and over half a million orphans. Ask the Iraqis, the Libyans, the Egyptians, the Tunisians, the Syrians, and the Afghans.

Ask the Russian President Putin. He chafes, a coiled Samson. His blindness is colour-blindness. He sees only red, even in America’s red, white, blue. Western leaders err in underestimating him. They taunt him as German Chancellor Angela Merkel did in a news conference. They provoke him through the bars Nato has planted in an arc on his western borders. They humiliate him with a last-minute threat of exclusion from the Rio Olympic Games on a stale accusation of ‘state-sponsored doping’ of Russian athletes. No wonder he simmers, a human cauldron bubbling with revenge, plotting retaliation whenever, wherever, however he can.

Ask US’s Cento ally Turkey. Its president Erdogan has no doubts about who sponsored the coup against him. He accuses the US of nurturing Fethullah Gülen, his former ally-turned-foe. Gülen enjoys US hospitality in exile as Ayatollah Khomeini did in France until 1979, when he returned to Tehran, after the Shah of Iran had been cleared away like some unsightly debris.

Turkey is the common bond between the equally unlamented general-president Pervez Musharraf and the Sharif brothers. To them, Turkey represented a beardless version of Saudi Arabia, secularism without sin. Will the coup in Turkey be a lesson for the Sharifs? Unlikely. They have no opponents in exile abroad. They themselves were the last of that breed. They need not root out disloyal generals. They have only one migraine — COAS Raheel Sharif — and his extension lies in the prime minister’s hands. They do not need to call their electorate onto the streets. The landslide results in the AJK elections are endorsement enough of their PML-N.

The public though is fickle by instinct. “The best lack conviction,” W.B. Yeats wrote in his poem The Second Coming, “whilst the worst are full of passionate intensity”. Will the American electorate prove him wrong?

The writer is an art historian.

www.fsaijazuddin.pk

Published in Dawn, July 28th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Afghan turbulence
Updated 19 Mar, 2024

Afghan turbulence

RELATIONS between the newly formed government and Afghanistan’s de facto Taliban rulers have begun on an...
In disarray
19 Mar, 2024

In disarray

IT is clear that there is some bad blood within the PTI’s ranks. Ever since the PTI lost a key battle over ...
Festering wound
19 Mar, 2024

Festering wound

PROTESTS unfolded once more in Gwadar, this time against the alleged enforced disappearances of two young men, who...
Defining extremism
Updated 18 Mar, 2024

Defining extremism

Redefining extremism may well be the first step to clamping down on advocacy for Palestine.
Climate in focus
18 Mar, 2024

Climate in focus

IN a welcome order by the Supreme Court, the new government has been tasked with providing a report on actions taken...
Growing rabies concern
18 Mar, 2024

Growing rabies concern

DOG-BITE is an old problem in Pakistan. Amid a surfeit of public health challenges, rabies now seems poised to ...