NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday made it clear that all state cricket associations have to “fall in line” with recommendations of Justice R.M. Lodha led-panel on structural reforms in the BCCI which was carried out in the wake of match-fixing and spot-fixing allegations.

“Once the BCCI is reformed it will go down the line and all cricket associations will have to reform itself if they want to associate with it. The committee constituted in wake of match-fixing and spot-fixing allegations was a serious exercise and not futile exercise,” a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur said.

The bench also comprising Justice F.M.I. Kalifulla, said that the recommendations of reforms at the BCCI were made by a committee of experts with extensive deliberations with the stake holders and finding can’t be said to be “just recommendations”.

“It will no longer remain just recommendations if we say it has to be implemented. It was called recommendations as some of the findings of the committee were implemented by the BCCI during the deliberations itself and some were not implemented.

“We are hearing the issue because we are seeing whether the recommendations which have not been implemented can be implemented or not,” the bench said to the Haryana Cricket Association which was objecting to the recommendations of Lodha panel.

Counsel appearing for the Haryana Cricket Association said that Lodha panel’s findings were just recommendations and few of them were not workable for cricket bodies to implement. “Justice Lodha committee has said that what has been done is just cosmetic and what is required is not cosmetic reforms but more than that,” the bench said.

The apex court also pulled up the Haryana Cricket Association for objecting to 70 years age cap for office bearers and said that “do some office-bearers in cricket bodies think that they are indispensable”.

“The BCCI has to reform. It has been a very corrupt body with few calling the shots. Nobody is indispensable leave alone the cricket administrators. There should be time when you have to say enough is enough and pave way for others to take charge,” the bench said.

Published in Dawn, May 3rd , 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Afghan turbulence
Updated 19 Mar, 2024

Afghan turbulence

RELATIONS between the newly formed government and Afghanistan’s de facto Taliban rulers have begun on an...
In disarray
19 Mar, 2024

In disarray

IT is clear that there is some bad blood within the PTI’s ranks. Ever since the PTI lost a key battle over ...
Festering wound
19 Mar, 2024

Festering wound

PROTESTS unfolded once more in Gwadar, this time against the alleged enforced disappearances of two young men, who...
Defining extremism
Updated 18 Mar, 2024

Defining extremism

Redefining extremism may well be the first step to clamping down on advocacy for Palestine.
Climate in focus
18 Mar, 2024

Climate in focus

IN a welcome order by the Supreme Court, the new government has been tasked with providing a report on actions taken...
Growing rabies concern
18 Mar, 2024

Growing rabies concern

DOG-BITE is an old problem in Pakistan. Amid a surfeit of public health challenges, rabies now seems poised to ...