Ismat and the breathing dead

Published October 21, 2015
The writer is an attorney teaching constitutional law and political philosophy.
The writer is an attorney teaching constitutional law and political philosophy.

THIS Saturday it will be 24 years since the author Ismat Chughtai died. A fiery woman, she was known for her acerbic and trenchant prose, piles of acutely observed short stories that lay bare the hypocrisies of middle-class Muslim society in pre- and post-Partition India.

It was the fiery ‘burial’ she chose decades later that made the Pakistani side of Urdu speakers uncomfortable. A Muslim writer must choose a Muslim interment, and the insecure borders of post-Partition South Asia dictate that such post-mortem predilections, even of the eccentric and eclectic, be considered complete repudiations.

So it was with Ismat Chughtai, whose receding position in the canon of Urdu literature has been chronicled in at least biannual laments near her birth and death dates. In an additional burden, Ismat Chughtai’s birthday falls on Aug 15; the detail that this happenstance took place in 1915, long before the divisive vagaries of Partition would mandate patriotic hatreds, is often lost in the fervid milieu of nationalist passions.


Writers have only words to commemorate what was taken from the mouths of the murdered others.


The calculations left to the subcontinent by the British also mandate that a hesitant embrace of Pakistan equals an amorous passion for India. Ismat Chughtai, the brilliant author, the talented wordsmith, the creative genius, chose to live in India even after Pakistan was carved out as the better location for the subcontinent’s Muslims.

For this, she was loved by India and Indians; their ardour for this living female testament to the superior soil offered by their staunchly secular environment was reflected in the pile of awards and titles with which they festooned her.

The possibility that Ismat Chughtai may have chosen to stay even in some small part from some mix of habit and familiarity, a banal repugnance towards the usually inconvenient project of migration, was not a proposition that anyone wished to consider. India the secular was assumed to be India the freer, more given to bending the restrictions of culture to suit the whims of reliably unpredictable writers and artists.

That may well have been the case then, but like so much else in a subcontinent increasingly empty of writers who lived through its bloody border carving, it is not so anymore. In the past several weeks, Indian writers, some of Muslim origin but mostly any who have had the temerity to question the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, have become subject to harassment and hate crimes.

Notable public intellectuals M.M. Kalburgi and Govind Pansare have been recently murdered, Narendra Dabholkar two years ago. Other writers and poets are also facing censorship and harassment; they include Perumal Murugan, scholar M.M. Basheer and poet K. Satchidanandan.

Dismayed by the Modi government’s failure to investigate the murders and cases of harassment, over 30 Indian writers have returned the Sahitya Akademi awards, among the highest literary honours awarded in India.

According to PEN International, the organisation that monitors literary freedom around the world and which is trying to organise a campaign to protect literary freedom in India, two ministers from the Modi government have even questioned the intentions of these writers in returning the awards.

In the words of PEN International, “It takes courage in the current climate in India to express dissent in a public manner. PEN International salutes the courage of and expresses solidarity with those who have returned the awards in protest or have resigned their membership of the Akademi....”

On the Pakistani side of the border, of course, there is even less room for glib satisfaction at the threatened state of Indian secularism. With recent months and years littered with the unabashed killing of writers, scholars, students and really anyone uninterested in the constricted agenda of a bloodthirsty few, the streets of the country are stained with the blood of slain intellectuals. If Indian writers are protesting, Pakistani intellectuals have had to flee or die or hide.

Those too poor to hire coteries of guards must beg at the embassies of former or recent colonial masters; those even poorer must keep quiet in life or be sentenced to a more permanent silence. The choices are all bleak and their paltry offerings have been lamented often on vast acres of newsprint filled with incessant and helpless eulogies. Writers after all have only words to commemorate the words that were taken from the mouths of the murdered others.

It is well that Ismat Chughtai is dead, however, for neither India nor Pakistan would have offered her much relief from the ever-constricting shackles of religiously motivated obscurantism. The dead who saw the hopeful, even if momentarily, birth of two separate nations seem luckier in their demise than they would be evaluating the miserable present.

As the two countries get older, they do not get wiser; new generations are reared on hatreds they are told are sacred. For the writer, it is a delicate balance of precision mourning: criticising Muslim persecution in India can launch mobs that kill the Hindus left behind in Pakistan; criticising Hindu persecution in Pakistan can launch mobs that kill Muslims left behind in India. There are a lot more of the latter but even such factual acknowledgements morph into macabre competitions of greater bigotries. The construction of a sentence, here or there, is burdened with this baggage; it is evidence of the success of a gruesome osmosis, the equalisation of hatreds on either side.

Ismat Chughtai is actually dead; others in Pakistan and in India and in all the other scattered corners of the world where they live and read and write in shrines to their lost lands, are the breathing dead — the living ones, their words stained with the pain of exile or the burden of censorship, the fire of zealotry that burns and burns unsated on either side.

The writer is an attorney teaching constitutional law and political philosophy.

rafia.zakaria@gmail.com

Published in Dawn, October 21st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...