Response to heatwave

Published July 3, 2015
Primer's visit, and the response of his govt more generally, appears almost flippant in the face of a large death toll. —INP/File
Primer's visit, and the response of his govt more generally, appears almost flippant in the face of a large death toll. —INP/File

ALMOST a week after the heatwave in the southern part of the country passed, leaving behind an alarming death toll, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif finally thought it worth his while to pay a quick visit to Karachi and make some inquiries. His visit was abbreviated, and cut short further as he attended one meeting with Sindh government officials and civil society leaders before departing straight for the airport. In the meantime, he offered condolences to the bereaved without finding the time to visit the hospitals where they were being treated, and left behind reports that an inquiry committee had been constituted to affix responsibility on those government departments that were negligent during the tragedy. All through the event itself, the federal government took the line that it was the Sindh government’s responsibility to formulate a response, and deflected charges that power outages that aggravated the death toll had anything to do with the centre since K-Electric is privately owned. But by insisting that the National Disaster Management Authority did indeed fashion a response, the federal government tacitly admitted that there was a role for it to play in such a situation. Nobody has asked whether the Met Department, another federal body, actually issued an alert in response to which government departments could have mobilised.

Mr Sharif’s visit, and the response of his government more generally, appears almost flippant in the face of a large death toll that crossed 1,200 in Karachi. First by participating in a blame game over who was responsible for the shoddy response, then by making a short and perfunctory visit whose only tangible outcome appears to be another committee, he has reinforced the perception that the city of Karachi has nobody to care for it. Sindh Chief Minister Qaim Ali Shah couldn’t abort his trip to Larkana as the death toll mounted during the heatwave, while Mr Sharif cut his own visit to Karachi short when he arrived in the city after the crisis had passed. What exactly does accountability mean at this point? What difference does it make that a committee will now be making some inquiries when both the federal and provincial governments are more interested in protecting their own image than sheltering the most vulnerable of lives from a crippling natural event? The residents of Karachi can do without mere lip service being paid to their troubles.

Published in Dawn, July 3rd, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...
By-election trends
Updated 23 Apr, 2024

By-election trends

Unless the culture of violence and rigging is rooted out, the credibility of the electoral process in Pakistan will continue to remain under a cloud.
Privatising PIA
23 Apr, 2024

Privatising PIA

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb’s reaffirmation that the process of disinvestment of the loss-making national...
Suffering in captivity
23 Apr, 2024

Suffering in captivity

YET another animal — a lioness — is critically ill at the Karachi Zoo. The feline, emaciated and barely able to...