LHC orders refund of surcharges in electricity bills

Published May 30, 2015
Appellants counsel argued that the power of the govt to levy the impugned surcharges, was a negation of the Constitution.—AFP/File
Appellants counsel argued that the power of the govt to levy the impugned surcharges, was a negation of the Constitution.—AFP/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has declared as illegal the recovery of surcharges, like Equalisation Surcharge, Debt Servicing Surcharge, Universal Obligation Fund Surcharge and Neelam Jhelum Surcharge, under electricity bills and directed the federal government to refund the amount collected under the heads of surcharges.

A division bench comprising Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Ayesha A. Malik issued the order on Friday disposing of an intra court appeal (ICA) filed by a cement company and others.

Advocate Azhar Siddique, the leading counsel of the appellants, argued that the power of the government to levy the impugned surcharges under Section 31(5) of the Nepra Act, 1997, was a negation of the Constitution.

Take a look: PHC stays recovery of power surcharges from CNG stations

He said that supply of electricity was a fundamental right under Article 9 read with 14 and the “Annual Tariff” determination under the prevailing practice by including the line losses, theft, administrative losses etc. was a violation of the fundamental rights, as also exploitation in term of Article 3 of the Constitution.

The bench struck down the Section 31 (5) of the Regulation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997, and the surcharges for being unconstitutional and illegal.

The bench directed the government/Nepra to refund/adjust the amount collected from consumers under the surcharges and to work out a repayment plan within three months from the receipt of the order.

Published in Dawn, May 30th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.