Cybercrime bill

Published May 24, 2015
Demonstrators hold placards during a protest organised by Civil Society against Cyber Law, at Jinnah Super Market Islamabad.— Online/file
Demonstrators hold placards during a protest organised by Civil Society against Cyber Law, at Jinnah Super Market Islamabad.— Online/file

It comes as a matter of relief that the National Assembly Standing Committee on Information Technology and Telecom has relented on its earlier inflexible stance and on Friday asked its members to hold consultations with experts to revise portions of the proposed Prevention of Electronic Crimes Bill 2015.

The controversy had been brewing for quite some time, and came to a head a little over a month ago when Minister of State for Information Technology Anusha Rehman announced that the bill had been finalised.

Read: NA committee agrees to re-examine cybercrime bill

But digital rights activists and industry professionals had been insisting that what was about to be tabled was not the draft originally hammered out with input from representatives of the IT industry; they contended that since then, the draft had been amended by a government-led sub-committee, and what was poised to be passed into law was a loosely worded piece of legal drafting that betrayed a poor grasp on the technical aspects of the internet and digital communications, as well as several deeply problematic clauses that were open to abuse.

Despite hectic lobbying by digital rights groups and other stakeholders, the National Assembly standing committee had so far been refusing to accept that there were any problems and had been pushing for a speedy passage of the bill into law.

Fortunately, better sense prevailed on Friday when, upon the intervention of PPP MNA Shazia Marri, members of the industry-led IT joint action committee were allowed into parliament to have their say.

Also encouraging is the fact that this did not turn into a routine hearing of objections; what had originally been intended as a 90-minute session ended up taking the best part of three hours, with the joint action committee urging the omission of a number of sections from the bill, offering several ways in which to avoid potential human and digital rights pitfalls, and pointing out ambiguities.

These gains need to be worked upon, and the draft scrutinised thoroughly so that the final version does not lend itself to mischief or abuse.

There is, after all, no extreme urgency, and many had been wondering why this piece of proposed legislation appeared set to be rushed through the scrutiny process, as several others have been in the recent past.

The 2007 Pakistan Electronic Crime Ordinance lapsed in 2009, and while there is no argument that the country needs effective laws to check cybercrime, it must take the time to get them exactly right.

Published in Dawn, May 24th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.