The new Scrabble dictionary is freaking out traditionalists

Published May 23, 2015
LINDA Williams of Laurel, Maryland, places her letters during a 2001 Scrabble tournament sponsored by the National Scrabble Association Club 171.
—The Washington Post
LINDA Williams of Laurel, Maryland, places her letters during a 2001 Scrabble tournament sponsored by the National Scrabble Association Club 171. —The Washington Post

PWN (8 points, to dominate an opponent). Thanx (15 points, thanks). Bezzy (18 points, several meanings, not all of which are printable).

Do these words sound “ridic” (8 points, ridiculous)? Collins, which publishes the official dictionary for the World English-Language Scrabble Players Association, doesn’t think so. All four terms, along with about 6,500 others, are included in its updated list of Official Scrabble Words released on Thursday.

Some of the additions are new because the concepts they describe are fairly new themselves, like “Facetime” (15 points, to speak with someone over video chat using the Facetime application on a phone).

Others, like “bezzy” and “thanx”, are straight up slang. You probably wouldn’t find them in a high school English essay, let alone the Oxford English Dictionary. But the Collins list includes them anyway, because people use them. And that’s actually kind of radical.

By bestowing official Scrabble legitimacy on “shizzle” and “tweep”, Collins waded into language’s longest running debate: should language rules dictate how we speak or reflect it?

On the one side are the prescriptivists, who believe that grammar books and dictionaries determine the “right” way to speak, and everyone should follow suit. A word that’s not in the dictionary isn’t missing — it just shouldn’t be used. Prescriptivists would shudder at “shizzle” (28 points, sure) and turn up their noses at “tweep” (10 points, someone who follows you on Twitter).

Opposing them are people who believe that language rules should be descriptive, that they ought to reflect the way people speak and write. This camp argues that prescriptive language rules stigmatise those who speak differently — for example, people who use African-American Vernacular English. It’s a means of “gatekeeping”, deciding who’s in and who’s out.

Noah Webster, the 19th-century creator and namesake of the tome that haunted you in grade school, would have none of it, according to linguist Rosemarie Ostler.

“Individuals who dictate to a nation the rules of speaking [have] the same imperiousness as a tyrant gives laws to his vassals,” Webster declared in 1789. He believed that fledgling democracy needed a democratic dictionary, one that reflected how Americans actually spoke.

But nearly two centuries later, that idea remained radical. In 1961, the publishers of Webster’s Third, the grandchild of his original dictionary, were excoriated for including casual terms like “ain’t” and “beatnik”.

“They have untuned the string, made a sop of the solid structure of English and encouraged the language to eat up himself,” one New Yorker critic lamented.

Doesn’t sound too different from today’s Scrabble dictionary critics, only now the prescriptivists voice their outrage on Twitter.

Helen Newstead, head of language content at Collins, explained to the BBC that their word list is based on printed evidence of word use. If you can find it written in enough places, they’ll include it. So “grr” (4 points, expressing anger or annoyance), which people type all the time, is in. “Meese” (7 points, plural of “moose”), which I just made up, is not.

“People use slang in social media posts, tweets, blogs, comments, text messages — you name it — so there’s a host of evidence for informal varieties of English that simply didn’t exist before,” Newstead said.

Not only is that argument essentially descriptivist, it also lends legitimacy to the sources of the new Scrabble words: Twitter, text messages, etc. It says that communicating through technology isn’t some degraded, lesser form of interaction and that the internet is as important a reservoir of language as handwritten letters.

Of course, the new additions to the Collins dictionary aren’t all acronyms and text slang. There are also technical terms like “geocache” (16 points, to search for hidden containers using GPS as a recreational activity) and words from other cultures like “quinzhee” (29 points, a shelter made from a hollowed-out mound of snow). In terms of linguistic clout, the Collins dictionary is no Oxford English Dictionary (and for the record, some of the new Scrabble terms are already in the OED, including “quinzhee” and “LOLZ”). But adding them to the list of recognised words means that people who geocache or camp in a quinzhee have been allowed “in”. It’s a symbolic opening of the cultural gates.

At least one person is ready to throw a welcome party: Craig Beevers, reigning Scrabble world champion, thinks the new words are “obvs LOLZ” (9 points, obviously, and 13 points, plural of LOL).

“Words reflect culture, particularly modern culture (I’ve honestly never heard of most of the latest additions),” he wrote in an opinion piece for The Guardian. “There will always be words people don’t like, but all you can ask of a dictionary is consistency. Language continues to evolve and so Scrabble and its word bible must keep up too.”

—By arrangement with The Washington Post

Published in Dawn, May 23rd, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...