COLOMBO: The much awaited talks between Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena and former President Mahinda Rajapaksa to sort out problems between them ended inconclusively on Wednesday.

“Today’s meeting was only a preliminary one. They will have to meet several times to sort things out. There are many knotty issues to be tackled,” a source close to Sirisena said.

The source insisted that the two leaders discussed only matters relating to their party, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP). While Sirisena is chairman of the party by virtue of being the President of Sri Lanka, Rajapaksa in a patron of the party by virtue of having been a past president of Lanka.

But the two are at daggers drawn because they contested the last presidential election in January as rival candidates. The SLFP, which is now divided into two factions, wants to fight the coming parliamentary elections as one party in order to beat the rival United National Party (UNP). But Sirisena and Rajapaksa are not able to see eye to eye on any issue.

On Tuesday, Sirisena’s office issued a statement which said that he would, under no circumstances, betray the over 6 million Lankans who voted for him in his talks with Rajapaksa.

On the same day, Rajapaksa also issued a statement saying that the Sirisena government is arresting his supporters out of sheer political vendetta. An army corporal, who was in his son Namal’s security group, was arrested on suspicion of planning to shoot Sirisena at a political meeting. These actions did not augur well for his talks with Sirisena, Rajapaksa said.

Meanwhile, Dilan Perera, a Rajapaksa loyalist, said the Rajapaksa-Sirisena talks are primarily meant to oust Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and his United National Party (UNP) from the government. This put Sirisena in a spot because he won the presidential election on the basis of the organisational strength of the UNP.

Mahinda Rajapaksa
Mahinda Rajapaksa

Opposing Dilan Perera, Democratic Peoples’ Front (DPF) leader, Mano Ganeshan, said the minority Tamils and Muslims would not allow Rajapaksa to come back to power as they had suffered immensely during his rule from 2005 to 2014.

Published in Dawn, May 7th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...