DCOs want LEAs to seek detention with evidence

Published May 5, 2015
“It was the heat of the moment when we detained the alleged hardcore elements. But the objectivity element in their detention was missing which was exposed when they approached courts and appellant authorities for their freedom,” a DCO admitted. — AFP/file
“It was the heat of the moment when we detained the alleged hardcore elements. But the objectivity element in their detention was missing which was exposed when they approached courts and appellant authorities for their freedom,” a DCO admitted. — AFP/file

LAHORE: Embarrassed over the release of nearly half of the detained alleged hardcore elements across the province for lack of evidence, almost all DCOs have reportedly asked police and other law-enforcement agencies to seek detention orders of only those against whom they have solid material for their involvement in any subversive activity.

“It was the heat of the moment when we detained the alleged hardcore elements. But the objectivity element in their detention was missing which was exposed when they approached courts and appellant authorities for their freedom,” a DCO admitted on Sunday.

According to information gathered by Dawn from various districts, the government had given the task of detaining all hardcore elements in the light of the National Action Plan (NAP) made in the aftermath of the attack on Peshawar’s Army Public School.

As a result, lists of the alleged hardcore persons were provided by district intelligence coordination committees comprising representatives of police and law-enforcement agencies. The stereotyped reports regarding the so-called evidence were submitted by these representatives.

“This process was not objective and was adopted in view of the pressure by the high-ups. The element of objectivity was missing that was why the courts and the appellate authorities had to order release of the detainees,” a DCO said.

Sources claimed that all the detainees were hardcore elements. They were under watch and could be detained. But the track record of those released accused was missing. For example, there was no evidence of when and where someone delivered hate speech or how one acted as a facilitator or harboured anyone and how one was a part of the fund providing channels.

“Courts seek evidence and I have asked the authorities concerned that they would have to keep it in mind,” a DCO said.

Published in Dawn, May 5th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...