China bank

Published March 25, 2015
It is not clear why the US would want to believe that the World Bank ought to be the only multilateral lending agency.—AP/File
It is not clear why the US would want to believe that the World Bank ought to be the only multilateral lending agency.—AP/File

THE Obama administration might have made a mistake in opposing China’s venture into multilateral lending, and is now standing more isolated than the country they sought to isolate.

One by one, countries have lined up to become part of the endeavour called the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, while the United States is alone in cautioning that the China-led initiative threatens to undermine the World Bank.

It is not clear why the US would want to believe that the World Bank ought to be the only multilateral lending agency dealing in infrastructure and social sector schemes, or that the Asian Development Bank is not being mentioned.

Also read: Britain to join China-led Asian bank

The world is a big place and there is plenty of room for other multilateral agencies to complement each others’ work. The head of the IMF and the government of Australia are the latest to add their voices of support to the venture. Clearly, they saw that there was little sense in opposing the AAIB.

There is even less sense in regarding the prospect of a Chinese move in multilateral infrastructure lending as some sort of a boon for Pakistan. It remains to be seen how the Chinese will deal with the problem of chronic users of their resources, and how they will approach the question of internal reform and conditionality-based lending.

Multilateral lending is a tricky game. Nobody wants to underwrite the economic dysfunctions of another forever, but urging the borrower to introduce reform brings the lender into the internal affairs of another country, something that the Chinese had been averse to until now.

As evidence of the deliberate and measured pace of movement, the Chinese have agreed to forego a veto in the bank, a move that was critical to win the support of the European countries.

The painstaking attention being given to governance issues these days is another indication that the bank is likely to be a more serious multilateral enterprise, and not an arm of Beijing’s foreign policy as the US has implied.

They are looking to not exercise the kind of power within the institution that the US has exercised at the IMF since its founding. It would be a mistake to underestimate the depth of the commitment that the Chinese are bringing to this enterprise.

It would also be a mistake to try and isolate them in the process. But equally it would be a mistake to regard the venture as some sort of big opportunity opening up for Pakistan.

Published in Dawn, March 25th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...