PAKISTAN has improved its trade profile in the European Union in the first year of the GSP Plus. But considering the potential the facility offers, the improvement has not been significant enough, both in terms of diversification of markets and commodities.

Exports to the EU are still concentrated in a few markets and restricted to a few commodities. About 60pc of the merchandise went to just five nations, with seven items contributing almost 75pc of the total exports.

However, a positive development is that value-added goods saw a ‘noticeable and a sizable increase’ in exports to less developed member-states.

There is no identifiable marker to measure the progress or lack thereof of the preferential trade package. The common yardstick to measure success is merely the overall increase in volume of export proceeds, or changes in the share of different products in the overall exports. However, a few markers can be used to assess Pakistan’s performance.

One can, however, discern some explicit outcome of the GSP Plus facility. In the first year, exports to Spain swelled 44pc to $814.828m from $564.402m in the previous year. This is the highest-ever increase in Pakistan’s exports to Spain.


Pakistan has been able to enhance its presence in the EU, as its exports surged by 21pc to $7.310bn this year. However, it is still way behind its regional competitors


Exports to Austria rose 93pc, followed by a 46pc growth to Poland and 14pc to Sweden. The cumulative share in Pakistan’s total exports to these four countries rose by 17pc to $1.202bn this year, from $839.601m a year earlier.

Cheaper imports owing to duty waivers and competitive unit prices of Pakistani goods benefited the consumers of these countries.

For instance, persistently high unemployment, low wages and a fall in purchasing power in Spain boosted the demand for cheaper Pakistani goods there.

Moreover, the EU package helped Pakistan find new markets in Eastern Europe to some extent. Export proceeds to the six-nation Eastern bloc were far less than $100m. However, the growth of exports, in percentage terms, to some of these countries was in double digits.

Exports to Bulgaria went up 44pc; Czech Republic 27pc; and Hungary 43pc. However, exports to Romania and Slovakia rose by only 8pc and 9pc, respectively. There is much potential to increase exports to these countries.

Pakistan’s exports are still concentrated in four markets — Germany, United Kingdom, Italy and Netherlands — which constitute 60.53pc ($4.425bn) of the total exports in the first year of the package, against 61.18pc ($3.685bn) in the previous year.

Meanwhile, exports to Estonia dropped by 11pc, Croatia 37pc, Ireland 3pc and Luxembourg 12pc from a year ago. Interestingly, the export values to these countries were much higher in calendar years 2012 and 2013 when compared with 2014 — the year Pakistan was granted the GSP Plus facility.

Pakistan’s traditional sectors, mainly textile and leather, benefited from the facility. The major beneficiary was the textile garments segment, which went up by over 28pc, followed by a 29pc increase in home textiles.

A minor growth of around 5pc was witnessed in the non-value added textile goods segment. Exports of footwear and some plastic product covers also benefited.

It appears that exporters have just diverted their products from other markets to Europe to avail the zero-duty facility.

Overall growth in textile and clothing exports remained negative, with the exception of minor rises in a few months, suggesting that the facility might not have helped Pakistan to move up the value chain. And no notable investments were made in the textile and clothing sectors.

For the apparent diversion of trade, exporters benefited from the zero-duty export facility and also from the almost 20pc depreciation of the euro against major currencies. This should not be considered an unqualified success of the GSP scheme.

Pakistan has been able to enhance its presence in the EU, as its exports surged by 21pc to $7.310bn this year from $6.023bn a year ago. However, it is still way behind its regional competitors.

At the end, the GSP Plus is all about sustainable development and good governance.

Published in Dawn, Economic & Business, March 9th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.