PTI, traders file petitions for, against Nov 30 rally

Published November 26, 2014
A banner display by traders of federal capital inscribed with appeal from protesting political parties to shift the sit-in to some where else.  - INP
A banner display by traders of federal capital inscribed with appeal from protesting political parties to shift the sit-in to some where else. - INP

ISLAMABAD: Traders and the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) have filed competing petitions in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) focusing on the latter’s rally on Nov 30.

All traders’ associations of Islamabad have challenged the rally, fearing it would hamper routine life in Islamabad and have asked that demonstrators be shifted from the vicinity of Blue Area, the main business center in the capital, to some other area such as industrial exhibition ground near Faizabad or the F-9 park, the traders said in their petition.

PTI, on the other hand, has filed an application seeking the lifting of Section 144 imposed in the federal capital since the start of Muharram, calling it a violation of fundamental rights.

PTI lawmaker Asad Umar, in a separate petition, sought court directions to restrain the government from illegally harassing their workers.

Hearing the traders’ petition, Justice Athar Minallah of the IHC has directed the Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) district magistrate to address the traders grievances.


Traders want rally venue shifted, PTI for lifting of Section 144


If the district magistrate fails to resolve the issue, the petitioners can come to the court again.

Eight traders associations of Islamabad from G-6, G-9, G-10 through their counsel Sardar Arshad Mehmood advocate filed the petition.

They adopted before the IHC that the business community felt threatened and endangered by the PTI chairman Imran Khan’s plan to reactivate his Dharna (sit-in) and so called Azadi-March on November 30 at D-Chowk.

Petitioners cited secretary ministry of interior, chief commissioner ICT, Inspector General Police ICT, district magistrate ICT and PTI chairman Imran Khan as respondents.

Petitioners told the court that they were elected representatives of the business community and the respective Traders Welfare Association/s of the Federal Capital.

The petition said the previous sit-in had already ruined and trampled the social and personal life of the residents of Islamabad. Petitioner alleged that PTI was staging the sit-in on the behest of district magistrate.

Petition contended that the respondents were under constitutional obligation to protect the life and property of the residents.

Petitioner requested the court to restrain Imran Khan and his party leaders, workers and allies from holding any sit-in, Jalsa or dharna on November 30.

The PTI petitions requested the court to declare Section 144 illegal as it would hamper free movement of their party workers and other citizen.

The PTI lawmaker expressing fear of arrests of party workers on and before November 30 sought court protection against the possible crackdown.

IHC Justice Minallah will hear PTI’s petition on Wednesday.

Published in Dawn, November 26th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.