The bottom 90pc are poorer today than they were in 1987

Published October 26, 2014
The bottom 90pc have kept losing net worth the past few years, in large part because of rising student-loan debt. -- Photo by AFP
The bottom 90pc have kept losing net worth the past few years, in large part because of rising student-loan debt. -- Photo by AFP

WASHINGTON: Once upon a time, the American economy worked for everybody, and even the middle class got richer.

But this story has been only a fairy tale for almost 30 years now. The new, harsh reality is that the bottom 90 per cent of households are poorer today than they were in 1987.

This is a much more dramatic statement than it sounds. While the Federal Reserve has told us that the median household is worth less now than it was in 1989 — that’s the household right in the middle — it turns out that everybody but the richest 10pc of Americans are worse off. That includes the poor, the entire middle class and even what we would consider much of the upper class.

You can see this troubling finding in a new paper from Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman on US wealth inequality, which is based on tax data.

Taking each group’s inflation-adjusted net worth from 1945 and indexing it to 100 makes it easier to compare how wealth has grown for people with lots or little of it. The bottom 90pc actually did very well during the first few decades of the post-war period — adding more wealth, in percentage terms, than those at the top.

But the days of shared prosperity have come to an end, gradually and then suddenly. It started in the 1980s when the top 1pc awoke from a long post-war slumber, thanks to the combination of lower taxes, financial deregulation and new technology. It wasn’t a total disaster for the bottom 90pc. Even as most Americans saved much less, accumulating far less wealth, stock markets and housing prices continued to rise — until they didn’t, crashing down in 2007 and 2008.

The problem was that the middle class didn’t own that much in stocks but went into debt to buy lots of housing. So the housing crash turned their biggest financial asset into an albatross, wiping out their equity but not their debt. And the housing recovery hasn’t done much to fix this, since it has struggled to move beyond the “nascent” stage.

Stocks, meanwhile, collapsed during the crisis but came back soon after. The middle class missed out on the big bull market in stocks but not on the even bigger bear one in housing. That’s why the recovery has restored so little of the wealth that the recession destroyed. In fact, the bottom 90pc have kept losing net worth the past few years, in large part because of rising student-loan debt.

By arrangement with The Washington Post-Bloomberg

Published in Dawn, October 26th, 2014

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...
By-election trends
Updated 23 Apr, 2024

By-election trends

Unless the culture of violence and rigging is rooted out, the credibility of the electoral process in Pakistan will continue to remain under a cloud.
Privatising PIA
23 Apr, 2024

Privatising PIA

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb’s reaffirmation that the process of disinvestment of the loss-making national...
Suffering in captivity
23 Apr, 2024

Suffering in captivity

YET another animal — a lioness — is critically ill at the Karachi Zoo. The feline, emaciated and barely able to...