Swann refutes Gooch’s charge

Published October 17, 2014
This picture shows England's Graeme Swann (R) celebrates taking a wicket with teammate Joe Root. — File photo/AFP
This picture shows England's Graeme Swann (R) celebrates taking a wicket with teammate Joe Root. — File photo/AFP

LONDON: Graeme Swann has insisted he did the right thing quitting midway through England’s 5-0 Ashes series thrashing despite Graham Gooch calling the decision ‘criminal’.

England great Gooch, the team’s batting coach on their woeful 2013-14 tour of Australia, told Daily Telegraph on Wednesday that the former off-spinner’s decision had been highly damaging to the team.

“It made us a laughing stock,” said Gooch, one of England’s most successful opening batsmen. “I cannot understand why he couldn’t stick it out until the end of the trip. It left a bad taste.”

Swann quit, with England 3-0 down, in December 2013 after deciding a longstanding elbow injury meant it was no longer possible for him to spin the ball properly.

“I understand [what he is saying],” Swann told several British newspapers. “Goochy is very old school. Perhaps if he had gained my perspective on it he might have seen the reasons why I did it. I think he is a bit misinformed thinking I just left because of form. It wasn’t because of form.

“It was because I just couldn’t turn a cricket ball, which, as a spin bowler, means you are useless to your team. It wasn’t a form thing, it was succumbing to the inevitable.”

Swann added he had made a mistake in not retiring after England’s 3-0 home Ashes win in 2013.

“In retrospect, I shouldn’t have gone on the tour at all,” he said. “That is my regret. I wish after The Oval Test I had read the signs more rather than just think, ‘I will be fine. Jim [Anderson] will get 30 wickets. I will only have to hold one end up. I will be fine and we will win the Ashes’. That is my only regret.”

Swann has dismissed Pietersen’s recently-published book as the ‘the biggest work of fiction since Jules Verne’.

Published in Dawn, October 17th, 2014

Opinion

Rule by law

Rule by law

‘The rule of law’ is being weaponised, taking on whatever meaning that fits the political objectives of those invoking it.

Editorial

Isfahan strikes
Updated 20 Apr, 2024

Isfahan strikes

True de-escalation means Israel must start behaving like a normal state, not a rogue nation that threatens the entire region.
President’s speech
20 Apr, 2024

President’s speech

PRESIDENT Asif Ali Zardari seems to have managed to hit all the right notes in his address to the joint sitting of...
Karachi terror
20 Apr, 2024

Karachi terror

IS urban terrorism returning to Karachi? Yesterday’s deplorable suicide bombing attack on a van carrying five...
X post facto
Updated 19 Apr, 2024

X post facto

Our decision-makers should realise the harm they are causing.
Insufficient inquiry
19 Apr, 2024

Insufficient inquiry

UNLESS the state is honest about the mistakes its functionaries have made, we will be doomed to repeat our follies....
Melting glaciers
19 Apr, 2024

Melting glaciers

AFTER several rain-related deaths in KP in recent days, the Provincial Disaster Management Authority has sprung into...