Musharraf ECL case: Govt plea indefinitely adjourned

Published October 1, 2014
A view of the Supreme Court. — File photo
A view of the Supreme Court. — File photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Wednesday indefinitely adjourned a government appeal against the removal of former military ruler Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf's name from the Exit Control List (ECL).

A five-judge larger bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk, adjourned the case indefinitely on the request of Musharraf's counsel.

The federal government had filed an appeal against a Sindh High Court (SHC) decision to remove the former president's name from ECL.

Earlier on Tuesday, Musharraf's legal team submitted a single-page application to the court requesting adjournment of the case, while citing the busy court schedule of Musharraf's lawyer, who is appearing before a special court in the treason case against the former president.

The federal government on Monday submitted the records of cases pending against Musharraf in different courts. The office of the attorney general of Pakistan (AGP) submitted records along with court orders in six different cases, such as Lal Masjid case, Benazir Bhutto murder case, judges' detention case and Nawab Akbar Bughti murder case among others.

On June 23, the apex court had suspended the SHC's judgment and adjourned the hearing for four weeks. The court on July 25 then rejected the former president's plea to schedule the hearing immediately after Eidul Fitr.

Issuing a four-page written order on July 1 for the same case, the top court observed that it has granted leave to the government's plea to consider four questions.

The court said whether or not the SC's April 8, 2013 interim order and the July 3, 2013 final order merge, the principle of merger was not attracted in this case regarding restriction on Musharraf's travel abroad.

The bench questioned whether the April 8 order was an interim one and if on the basis of integration of the law the interim decision was included in the final order issued on July 3.

“Can the SHC suspend the April 5, 2013 decision to place Musharraf's name on the ECL?” the bench had asked. The bench also questioned if, without modification or reversal of the SC's April 8, 2013 order, Musharraf can be permitted to leave the country.

Musharraf is facing four criminal cases including high treason case, filed by the federal government. Prior to the filing of government's complaint, four petitions were filed before the SC in which the petitioners had prayed for direction to the federal government to prosecute Musharraf under the 1973 high treason Act.

The court on April 8, 2013 directed secretary interior to ensure Musharraf's name was placed on the ECL. His name had already been placed on the ECL on April 5, 2013 pursuant to the SHC's March 29, 2013 order in which it was directed that Musharraf will not leave the country without permission of the trial court.

Later, a division bench of the SHC declined to exclude Musharraf's name from ECL.

Musharraf challenged the federal government's April 5, 2013 order placing him on the ECL as well as the April 2, 2014 order rejecting his application to withdraw the earlier order.

The SHC on June 12 allowed his plea and struck down the Office Memorandum dated April 5, 2013 on the grounds that the top court's April 4 order had merged into a final order dated July 3, 2013, wherein all four petitions were disposed off but no order was made to place Musharraf's name on the ECL.

Additionally, the April 4, 2013 memorandum had not mentioned any of the grounds enumerated in Rule 2 of the Exit from Pakistan (Control) Rules 2010 – according to which the federal government is empowered to prevent any person from leaving the country.


Treason trial: Special Court adjourns hearing till Thursday


Meanwhile, the Special Court trying Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf under high treason act for abrogating and subverting the Constitution by proclaiming emergency in the country, adjourned hearing of the case till Thursday.

The case was heard by a two-member bench headed by Justice Tahira Safdar and comprising Justice Yawar Ali.

Mushrraf's counsel Barrister Farogh Naseem is due to present his stance in the court based on the previous trials tomorrow. He argued over the petition filed for including Musharraf's associates in the case trial.

The court ordered him to present a written legal stance before the judge in tomorrow's hearing. Naseem requested the court to cancel the hearing for tomorrow due to some engagements. However, rejecting his request, the court adjourned the hearing till Thursday morning. Justice Faisal Arab was on leave and therefore was not present in today's trial.

Earlier, the case hearings had been delayed because the premises of the special court is located opposite the Supreme Court building on Constitution Avenue where followers of PTI Chairman Imran Khan and PAT chief Dr Tahirul Qadri are staging a protest sit-in against the government.

Opinion

Editorial

Afghan turbulence
Updated 19 Mar, 2024

Afghan turbulence

RELATIONS between the newly formed government and Afghanistan’s de facto Taliban rulers have begun on an...
In disarray
19 Mar, 2024

In disarray

IT is clear that there is some bad blood within the PTI’s ranks. Ever since the PTI lost a key battle over ...
Festering wound
19 Mar, 2024

Festering wound

PROTESTS unfolded once more in Gwadar, this time against the alleged enforced disappearances of two young men, who...
Defining extremism
Updated 18 Mar, 2024

Defining extremism

Redefining extremism may well be the first step to clamping down on advocacy for Palestine.
Climate in focus
18 Mar, 2024

Climate in focus

IN a welcome order by the Supreme Court, the new government has been tasked with providing a report on actions taken...
Growing rabies concern
18 Mar, 2024

Growing rabies concern

DOG-BITE is an old problem in Pakistan. Amid a surfeit of public health challenges, rabies now seems poised to ...