Investigation into Red Zone violent clash dropped

Published October 1, 2014
— Photo by AP/file
— Photo by AP/file

ISLAMABAD: The Joint Investigation Team (JIT) probing the criminal case registered against the prime minister and a host of government leaders and officials by the Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) following the bloody violence in the Red Zone on August 30, has been disbanded.

Official sources said the local administration took the decision after PAT’s objections that some members of the JIT were among the accused it named in its FIR filed with police in the aftermath of the violence.

It was the second JIT disbanded by the administration in recent times.

The previous one was probing the former president, retired General Pervez Musharraf, for the 2007 Lal Masjid military operation.

It was dissolved on the objection of the mosque clerics that two of its members were retired military officers and reconstituted to the satisfaction of the clerics.


The decision was taken after PAT raised objections against some JIT members


Four persons were killed and several injured in the August 30 clash between PAT protesters trying to march on the Prime Minister House and police and other security forces guarding the government buildings in the Red Zone.

Inspector General of Police of Islamabad constituted the JIT on September 21 on the instructions of the Chief Commissioner of Islamabad, five days after the police registered the criminal case against the government leaders and officials on the orders of a local court.

Meanwhile, a third FIR, filed by the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) about the same incident, has been registered against the prime minister and others.

PAT’s objections to the JIT members notwithstanding, the sources believed the main reason behind the dissolution of the JIT was a report that the government recently submitted to the Supreme Court on the political turmoil in the city and its fallout.

It alleged that PAT’s recourse to courts for the registration of its FIR was designed to avoid the investigation into the incident and described the FIR as a counterblast and mischievous attempt aimed at achieving political gains by maligning holders of constitutional offices.

Published in Dawn, October 1st , 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.