ISLAMABAD: The top court on Monday submitted that the ongoing political crisis and alleged violation of fundamental rights ensuing from the impasse between the government and Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) are a matter for the government to decide.

“It is for the government to handle,” a five-member bench headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Nasir-ul-Mulk said about the ongoing sit-in, during the hearing of a petition filed last week by Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Kamran Murtaza.

During today's hearing, Attorney General Salman Aslam Butt had said that fundamental rights are being violated.

During the hearing, Justice Mian Saqib Nisar said, “We are the guardians of the constitution, we have taken oath under the constitution. We cannot permit any deviation... This is our obligation.”

He referred to Article 4 (relating to loyalty to the state) and Article 6 (relating to treason) and asked the petitioner, “Is it possible to violate the constitution?”

Murtaza replied saying that while it is otherwise not possible, in this situation it is possible that there may be a violation.

Nisar maintained that the petitioner has to submit a comprehensive statement

On the eve of Independence Day, Murtaza rushed a hurriedly drafted petition before the Supreme Court; seeking to restrain state functionaries from taking any “extra-constitutional steps”.

The petitioner had argued that the current political impasse is adversely affecting all spheres of national life and such a situation may embolden some authorities to take undue advantage of the situation and to resort to unconstitutional measures, the petitioner argued.

Moving quickly to pre-empt any possible military action against the democratically elected government, the Supreme Court on Friday restrained state authorities from taking any steps unwarranted by the Constitution and the law.

The court, however, chose not to close the case and postponed further hearing to August 18 (today), saying that the petitioner’s contentions required more consideration. The court had issued notices to AGP Salman Aslam Butt as well as the federal government.

Perhaps realising the gravity of the situation, Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk had constituted a five-judge larger bench which included Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja, Justice Mian Saqib Nisar, Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Justice Mushir Alam.

The case will be taken up again on Wednesday.

Members of bar associations across the country are going to convene on August 21 to discuss the ongoing political crisis and its repercussions on democracy.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.