Shaukat Aziz ordered judges’ sacking: official

Published June 27, 2014
Former Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz.—File photo
Former Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz.—File photo

ISLAMABAD: Interior Secretary Shahid Khan admitted before the special court trying retired General Pervez Musharraf that in the wake of November 3, 2007 emergency, several judges including former chief justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry had been sent home by the law ministry on the orders of then prime minister Shaukat Aziz.

On the third day of cross-examination, Musharraf’s counsel Farogh Nasim asked the interior secretary whether the proposal for the ouster of judges was initiated by then law secretary retired Justice Ajmal Mian and Law Minister Zahid Hamid and subsequently approved by the prime minister. The interior secretary, after consulting the documents handed to him by the attorney, replied, “Yes”.

Answering another question, he said, “It is correct to suggest that the summary for the appointment of Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar as chief justice of Pakistan was moved by the law secretary and the minister and was approved by the prime minister.”

He added, “It is correct that the notifications with regard to ceasing of office of the judges of the superior judiciary and the fresh appointments (of judges) were made on the recommendations of the law secretary and the minister with the approval of the prime minister.”


Shahid Khan insists PCO judges not complicit in imposition of emergency


Barrister Nasim argued that following the imposition of emergency, the federal cabinet in its meeting of November 6, 2007 approved the action of former president Pervez Musharraf and on November 7, the National Assembly unanimously passed a resolution endorsing the emergency.


Related: Musharraf’s counsel grills top official for leaving out coup charge


He said then prime minister Shaukat Aziz and cabinet members Zahid Hamid, Mohammad Ali Durrani and Tariq Azim also held a press conference, announcing their approval of the decision to impose a state of emergency.

When Barrister Nasim asked Mr Khan whether Shaukat Aziz, Zahid Hamid, Mohammad Ali Durrani, Tariq Azim and former law secretary Ajmal Mian and the members of the National Assembly who endorsed the emergency had “aided and abetted General Musharraf”, Mr Khan said, “No,” adding that this matter had not been brought into his knowledge by the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) constituted to investigate the treason charges against the defendant.

When asked why he did not take action against those members of the 2007 cabinet whose identities were known to him, Mr Khan said, “I did not order against any member of the then-cabinet because the JIT did not bring forward any material against them.”


Also read: SHC rejects Musharraf's review petition


He also disagreed with the defence counsel, who suggested that the judges who took oath under the Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO) had also abetted General Musharraf in the imposition of emergency.

The interior secretary told the court that he had been unable to get hold of records of meetings retired General Musharraf had held with the services chiefs and corps commanders to discuss the imposition of emergency.

He said the JIT had tried to obtain the record from the defence ministry, but the ministry had not provided the necessary documents so far.

The special court adjourned proceedings until July 2 when Barrister Nasim will continue his cross-examination of the interior secretary.

Published in Dawn, June 27th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.