PESHAWAR: An election tribunal here on Friday dismissed a petition challenging the election of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf MNA Imran Khattak on the ground of disenfranchising women voters in several polling stations of his constituency NA-5 during the by-elections last year.

The tribunal, presided over by Mr Shahjee Rehman Khan, pronounced a short order to dismiss the election petition filed by the rival candidate belonging to Awami National Party, Daud Khattak.

The petitioner had lost to Mr Imran in by-elections held on Aug 22 in NA-5, Nowshera-I. The said seat was vacated by Pervez Khattak as he had retained the provincial assembly seat won by him in the general elections.

On the day of polling the then Peshawar High Court chief justice Dost Mohammad Khan had taken notice of the issue of disenfranchising women voters in several polling stations in NA-5. The high court had stayed the announcement of the election results and ordered the Election Commission of Pakistan to hold polling in all those polling stations where women were restrained from casting votes.

However, on a petition filed by Mr Imran the Supreme Court had set aside that orders of the high court on Sept 17 on the ground that the PHC chief justice had no powers to exercise suo motu jurisdiction when an aggrieved person had not approached the court.

Following the SC order, some female voters approached the high court stating that they were barred from casting votes, but the court referred them to the election tribunal. The women voters were witnesses in the election petition filed by Mr Daud.

Counsel for the petitioner contended that in around 40 polling stations women were barred from casting vote. He said that women were deprived of their political right by not allowing them to cast vote.

The counsel appearing for Mr Imran contended that the charges of disenfranchising women could not be proved. He stated that polling stations were set up for voters and all arrangements were made therein and Mr Imran could not be held responsible if any voter did not turn up to cast vote.

Published in Dawn, May 31th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

SOME clearly thought that senior judges would prove just as easily ‘manageable’ as our seasoned politicians...
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.