Anti-judge banners, posters in Islamabad irk SC

Published May 27, 2014
Supreme Court judge, Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja. – File Photo
Supreme Court judge, Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja. – File Photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Director General Intelligence Bureau (IB) and Secretary Interior to investigate objectionable banners and posters on the roads of federal capital against Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja and submit a detailed report in 24 hours.

The two-member bench comprising Justice Khawaja and Justice Gulzar Ahmed resumed hearing of a petition filed by the Independent Media Corporation (IMC) on behalf of Geo Network against negative propaganda by other TV channels and to resume its transmission on cable TV networks.

The court remarked that if unknown people can post banners in the red zone of the federal capital then they can do some other dangerous work which could be harmful for the country.

During the course of proceedings, Akram Shaikh – the counsel for Geo TV – told the court that cable operators have suspended the transmission of the troubled news channel in more than 90 per cent areas of the country.

The Supreme Court in its order on August 13, 2012 clearly mentioned that cable operators cannot block transmission of any channel without approval of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regularity Authority (Pemra), he added.

He pleaded the court to accept his petition and issue direction to restore the channel’s transmission as the court in its previous order did not issue clear guidelines for cable operators.

On this, Justice Gulzar remarked that the review petition was disposed of after receiving reports of restoration of the TV channel transmission.

Ibrahim Satti, the counsel for Pemra informed the court that the media regulatory body was bound to follow the previous order of the court and was implementing the court order in its true spirit.

Zahid Malik, the legal head for Pemra assured the court that the 2012 decision would be implemented.

Under the 2012 decision, cable operators cannot block channels without their licence being cancelled or suspended by Pemra.

Pemra officials informed the court that action would be taken against those who removed channels.

Later, the court adjourned the hearing till May 28.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.