ISLAMABAD: While hearing a petition filed by a district and sessions judge against his repatriation to Punjab, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) will examine the appointment of two other judges who were absorbed in the Islamabad judiciary along with the petitioner.

Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) judge Atiqur Rehman, additional district and sessions judge (ADSJ) Kamran Basharat Mufti and District and Sessions Judge (DSJ) Syed Muzaffar Ali Shah had joined the Islamabad Judicial Service on deputation in 2011 in BS-22.

The IHC authorities sent (DSJ) Syed Muzaffar Ali Shah back to the Punjab Judicial Service on April 9, 2013.

In its notification, the IHC administration said the DSJ Syed Muzaffar Ali Shah’s services were no longer required and he was being repatriated to his parent department as additional district and sessions judge in BS-20.

Shah through his counsel Syed Javed Akbar challenged the order of the IHC for sending him back to his parent department that too in lower grade.

His counsel adopted before the IHC Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui that on March 17, 2011, IHC administration committee decided to absorb the Atiqur Rehman from Bloachistan, Kamran Basharat Mufti from Punjab and the petitioner Shah.

Upon having option from the Petitioner, IHC made a request to the Lahore High Court (LHC) on March 21, 2011 for issuance of a no objection certificate for purpose of absorption of the petitioner in the subordinate judiciary of Islamabad.

After completing all the requirements, Shah, Mufti and Rehman were absorbed in the Islamabad judiciary on March 28, 2011.

In April last year the petitioner was sent back to the parent department on the pretext that he was not absorbed in accordance with the rules.

The petitioner subsequently relinquished the charge on April 11 and after a considerably long period of 3 months and 6 days, LHC administration allowed him to join Punjab Judicial Service as ADSJ.

The counsel alleged that the judge was not given due process of hearing at a proper forum for redressal of his grievances and was condemned unheard.

He requested the court to set aside the order for his repatriation enabling the petitioner to resume his work in Islamabad judiciary as DSJ.

The court however asked him to name Judge Rehman and ADSJ Mufti as parties in the petition and adjourned the matter.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.