Local court takes up Musharraf’s bail plea

Published October 20, 2013
Earlier on July 12 this year, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) had ordered the Aabpara police to register a murder case against Mr Musharraf while hearing a petition filed by Haroon Rasheed, Ghazi Rasheed’s son.  — File Photo by Reuters
Earlier on July 12 this year, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) had ordered the Aabpara police to register a murder case against Mr Musharraf while hearing a petition filed by Haroon Rasheed, Ghazi Rasheed’s son. — File Photo by Reuters

ISLAMABAD: A local court of Islamabad on Saturday took up the petition filed by former president General (retired) Pervez Musharraf seeking his post-arrest bail in the Ghazi Abdul Rasheed murder case.

Ghazi Rasheed was the deputy Khateeb (cleric) of Lal Masjid and was killed in the 2007 operation at the mosque.

Earlier on July 12 this year, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) had ordered the Aabpara police to register a murder case against Mr Musharraf while hearing a petition filed by Haroon Rasheed, Ghazi Rasheed’s son.

Haroon Rasheed had alleged that Mr Musharraf had issued the orders to conduct the 2007 operation in which his (Haroon’s) father and grandmother were killed. However, instead of complying with the court’s order, the police had sought the opinion of the law ministry.

Therefore, on September 2, the high court summoned the SHO of Aabpara police station, Inspector Qasim Niazi, and ordered him to register the murder case in the court premises.

In the bail petition, Mr Musharraf’s counsel Advocate Ilyas Siddiqui maintained before the additional sessions judge Wajid Ali that the former president had no role in the 2007 operation.

He said the district administration had requested the military operation after exploring all other options for a peaceful settlement during the Lal Masjid standoff.

According to Mr Siddiqui, the joint investigation team constituted to probe the murder case found no evidence against Mr Musharraf, adding that the former president should not be kept behind bar for mere allegations.

On the other hand, Tariq Asad, the counsel of Haroon Rasheed, submitted a paper of attorney (wakalatnama) in court, and requested the court to adjourn the matter for a short period as he wanted to prepare his arguments.

Subsequently, the hearing of the matter was adjourned till October 23.

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...