ISLAMABAD, Sept 7: A special meeting of the Judicial Commission (JC) held here on Saturday to consider amendments suggested by the lawyers’ body in the Judicial Commission Rules 2010 remained inconclusive.

An informed source told Dawn that the commission deliberated on the proposed amendments and decided to continue with the discussion some other day because the composition of the body was not complete with several participants, including senior judges, federal and provincial law ministers and provincial bar representatives, not in attendance.

The JC suggests names for the appointment of judges to the superior judiciary which are then forwarded to an eight-member Parliamentary Committee comprising members of the National Assembly and Senate for its approval and finally these names are sent to the president for his approval.

Both the high-powered bodies were constituted under article 175 of the constitution after the 18th and the 19th Amendments.

During its meeting on March 9, the Pakistan Bar Council had suggested amendments to JC’s rules numbers 2, 3, 6 and 8.

The proposed amendments recommend that in order to have purposeful and meaningful consultation the representative of the PBC should be taken into confidence before the initiation and sending of names to the commission by the chief justice or the chief justices of high courts.

Similarly, the decision to relax any rule should be decided by the entire commission in the public interest and not by the chairman alone.

The PBC is of the view that any member of the commission should have the right to propose names for the appointment of judges in the commission’s meeting.

The source said that Yaseen Azad, the PBC’s representative to the JC, told the meeting that article 175 of the constitution was silent on the point that names for the appointment of judges should only be proposed by the JC’s head.

He was of the view that the Oct 21, 2010 interim order pronounced by a 17-judge full bench of the Supreme Court, in which guidelines for parliament to amend the 18th amendment were suggested, was ineffective.

He said that since the case had not yet been concluded and was adjourned but never heard again, it should be taken up and concluded.

It was suggested to Mr Azad that the PBC should file an application for an urgent hearing. But he replied that since the council was not a party in the case, the court should fix and decide the matter itself.

More From This Section

SC declares appointment of NAB chief legal

The court has disposed of PTI chief Imran Khan's petition against appointment of Qamar Zaman Chaudhry as chairman NAB.

Nawaz vows to spend $1.6bn on Balochistan development

Addressing the cabinet meeting in Islamabad, the prime minister said that he himself will monitor these projects.

Police arrest six suspected LJ militants

Police said the suspects are responsible for killing 16 people over the last two years and for four attempted murders.

Khawaja Asif takes U-turn, calls Pakistan Army an asset

The defence minister called his past statements a mistake and insisted that those were made in a difference context.


Comments are closed.

Comments (2)

syed baqar ahsan
September 8, 2013 1:17 pm

Now judicial commission is smelling hatred against itself remain party to CJP who's marriage time with the chair ending,should have resigned what he faced during his last visit to home town

Ali
September 8, 2013 1:26 pm

Is there one important litigation that has been completed and reached its logical conclusion during last 8 years very long tenure of this CJ? Baluchistan missing person case, Swiss bank money case, Election rigging case, corruption cases, Asghar khan case etc etc etc etc ................ Everyone is not as lucky as Arsalan whose case is the only one that was completed in a timely manner all other decisions are kept pending and delayed

Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Poll
From The Newspaper
Tweets