Yesterday, President Asif Ali Zardari attended yet another farewell lunch – given by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

The farewell events and the president’s departure have focused attention on his term as president.

Though it was not an easy five years for the president, he survived till the very end despite the criticism that his active involvement in partisan politics was not possible with his status as head of the state.

However, one can be certain that his successor, president-elect, Mamnoon Hussain, will not prove so assertive. After all, like Rafique Tarrar, Mr Hussain has been chosen because he will sit quietly in the house in the hill and not steal the limelight away from Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

However, the president-elect seems to be quite fond of the media.

Since his election victory, Mr Hussain has done a fairly decent job of remaining in the media and commenting on all things political.

Within a short span of one month – even before he has moved into the presidency - Mr Hussain has given detailed interviews to almost all mainstream news television channels. Till recently, he met guests at the state guest house in Karachi.

And in order to ensure that the right quarters found out how busy and popular he was, press releases on his daily meetings and activities were issued.

And if this question was asked about Mr Zardari, it also needs to be asked about Mr Hussain.

Is it appropriate for the head of a state, who constitutionally is a symbol of the federation, to delve into controversial, political issues such as the proposed talks with the Taliban.

Appearing in a TV talk show on August 5, Mr Hussain spoke in favour of negotiating with armed militants. His argument, as has been forwarded by many others, was that if the US could engage the Taliban in Afghanistan, why could not “we in Pakistan”.

This may not be a controversial view for a member of the PML-N as the party supports this point of view. But as president elect, should he have expressed sentiments that are not shared by everyone in the country?

In the second week of August, in an interview with a newspaper, Mr Hussain spoke at length about the foreign policy options for Pakistan and added that the country’s interests could be best served by forging warm relations with India, Russia, Iran and China.

Last week, Mr Hussain in a meeting with the businessmen of Karachi, urged them to pressure the Sindh government to act against the criminal gangs involved in extortion, targeted killings and terrorism.

On the face of it, this too appeared to be a politically motivated advice rather than the actions of a neutral representative of the federation.

Mr Hussain would do well to remember that constitutionally his is a very limited role.

After the passage of the 18th Constitutional amendment, all presidential powers which the former president General Musharraf had usurped for himself, were transferred to the parliament. They now rest with the prime minister, the head of the executive.

This after all is how the Westminster model of democracy or the parliamentary form of government works, which is the model on which the Pakistani political system is based.

Due to the frequent military interventions and the tendency of khaki clad strong men to cling on to power, executive powers were concentrated in the office of the president.

However, like Mr Tarrar, Mr Hussain, the 12th president, will not enjoy any such perks and powers. He will serve as the ceremonial head that is traditionally the case in the parliamentary model.

Mr Zardari too did not enjoy any powers as a president but because of his control of the Pakistan People’s Party, which ruled in Islamabad and in Sindh, he enjoyed considerable influence – behind the scenes.

“President Zardari virtually ran the PPP government single-handedly,” commented a Quaid-i-Azam University (QAU) professor of Political Science, who did not want to be named.

But regardless of what anyone thought of Mr Zardari’s decision to juggle the presidency and a political party, it would be better for the health of the democratic system in Pakistan if the next president stuck to his constitutional role.

“We need true implementation of the 1973 constitution, according to which the president is not closely associated with a political party or controversial political decisions. He should stay out of public view except on mandatory occasions,” said the professor.

It remains to be seen how the president-elect will conduct himself after formally moving into the presidency. Though his future actions may be hard to predict, it can be said with certainty that the prime minister will allow him little freedom to stray from the constitutional role.

More From This Section

Ministers don’t appreciate ‘value’ of food

ISLAMABAD: Members of the federal cabinet don’t usually miss any opportunity they get to remind the people that...

I-11’s ‘rightful’ land owners seek possession

Judge asks slum dwellers’ counsel to produce documents justifying their occupation of the land

Ex-UC nazim held for smuggling narcotics

ISLAMABAD: A former union council (UC) nazim of Hangu was arrested along with an official of the levies, while...

10 teachers booked for leaking exam paper

The accused will be tried for criminal breach of trust under Pakistan Penal Code

Comments are closed.

Comments (17)

September 6, 2013 10:32 am

I don't see any problem even if he enjoys those powers. What I don't want to see is him getting involved in corruption.

Amina Ahmed
September 6, 2013 10:47 am

Nothing new... It is quite obvious that he has been chosen to sit quietly!

September 6, 2013 10:58 am

How does the Constitution of Pakistan define the role of the President is more important than the perception or wish of what his role ought to be.

The writer has not clarified this issue.

fida sayani
September 6, 2013 3:20 pm

From his interview to the press, one can summarize that either he is incompetent or a bully. in either case he is not qualified to be a President of the country.

Irshad Ahmad
September 6, 2013 3:34 pm

The writer should take a course in Parliamentary Democracy rather than comparing Party politics and trying to create a friction between the new President and the Prime Minister. He should not try to antagonize the atmosphere with his wish full philosophy.

September 6, 2013 4:19 pm

Khawar Ghumman Sahab, the Prime Minister of Britian as indeed the President of USA are just mouth pieces. Wish you knew that.

September 6, 2013 6:11 pm

Mamnoon Husain needs to learn to talk less and stay in the background -- not as a partisan of PML(N).

September 6, 2013 10:13 pm

Do Pakistanis need a president, or even a prime minister? Country is run by the agencies and the army chief then why waste money on president and prime minister

molana diesel
September 6, 2013 11:02 pm

What to do with powers, he will enjoy his life in presidency.

September 6, 2013 11:32 pm

mamnoon hussain will be a successful president, I hope so and I pray for him.may god bless him and Pakistan.aamin!

Nayar Haq
September 7, 2013 12:55 am

You wait and watch he will change

September 7, 2013 2:06 am

@toocool: Mamnnon Husain is figurehead President of Pakistan like the Queen of England -- not the Prime minister of Pakistan - Nawaz Sharif is.

September 7, 2013 4:24 am

Zardari was fully at the helm of affairs as the PP prime ministers were just "yes men". This will change as NS is now totally in charge, Mamnoon should not involve himself in politics but should get involved in some social work for the betterment of the poor.After all he will be getting salary and benefits at the expense of the tax payers.

September 7, 2013 11:09 am

By the way his son is heading Cash Management of Citibank Pakistan....lols

Agha Ata
September 7, 2013 5:47 pm

Poor president!

A.Majid Khan
September 7, 2013 6:56 pm

What is the idea of having a President with out powers as a statue and spend millions of Rupees on him and on his office staff and kitchen?

Gerry D'Cunha
September 8, 2013 2:20 pm

obviously he is going to only enjoy protocals as a puppet president

Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Front Page