THIS is with reference to the letter ‘Death of (social) sciences’ (Aug 3) by Prof (Dr) Surayya Khatoon. I agree with the views expressed by the writer, but there is a point to dissent.

It might be that, as pointed by the writer, the best brains have not been joining the sciences, but keeping in mind the present system of education in this part of the world, which is based on rote learning, how can one differentiate between a crammer and an intellectual?

And let us not ignore the blatant abrogation of merit in the name of quota system. Most students (including myself) opt for alternative choices because basic sciences do not offer a promising career.

Moreover, it is a fact that the people holding key positions in public-sector research institutions are not creating enough opportunities for the younger lot. Students here have the potential and the intellect. The only requirement yet to be fulfilled is an opportunity to use these.

NAZIA AMBRIN Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

PTI allegations: ISI & MI

THE PTI has made serious allegations of rigging in the 2013 elections. For the survival of democracy, elections must...

Thank you Australia

THE hostage siege in Sydney in which an Iranian-born Muslim man held the staff and customers of a café hostage...

Speed breaker

SPEED breakers are quite common around the world as methods to prevent overspeeding. In a residential neighbourhood ...

Comments (0) Closed