THIS is with reference to the letter ‘Death of (social) sciences’ (Aug 3) by Prof (Dr) Surayya Khatoon. I agree with the views expressed by the writer, but there is a point to dissent.

It might be that, as pointed by the writer, the best brains have not been joining the sciences, but keeping in mind the present system of education in this part of the world, which is based on rote learning, how can one differentiate between a crammer and an intellectual?

And let us not ignore the blatant abrogation of merit in the name of quota system. Most students (including myself) opt for alternative choices because basic sciences do not offer a promising career.

Moreover, it is a fact that the people holding key positions in public-sector research institutions are not creating enough opportunities for the younger lot. Students here have the potential and the intellect. The only requirement yet to be fulfilled is an opportunity to use these.

NAZIA AMBRIN Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad

Updated Sep 03, 2013 07:38am

More From This Section

Sadequain’s work on sale?

THIS is apropos news report by Taymour Soomro ‘Sadequain’s work fetches high price at auction’ (April 16). For...

Clarification

THIS is in response to the letter by Yahya Khan (March 21). The series referred to is the New Oxford Modern English...

Doctors and ethics

THE duty of a doctor is to save the life of a patient. However, many doctors even after taking exorbitant...

Education scholarship

THE prime minister’s scholarship was launched in Balochistan during the last PPP government. Under this ...

Comments (0) (Closed)