THE frequency has dropped precipitously, but drone strikes still stir the pot and every fresh strike raises a host of old questions. As ever, there are multiple versions of the drone strike on Saturday in North Waziristan. According to security officials, the target was a compound belonging to Hafiz Gul Bahadur that was presently housing militants from Tajikistan. Little of that version is surprising: Hafiz Gul Bahadur is the quintessential ‘good Taliban’ who cuts deals with the state, but also has a ‘bad Taliban’ side that gives sanctuary to foreign militants. But then there’s the other version, that of the government in Islamabad. For one, the Foreign Office issued a boilerplate statement of concern — relations with the US could be negatively affected if unilateral strikes continue, the statement seemed to suggest. For another, murmurs of concern were raised about the possible impact on the as-yet-denied back-channel talks with the Taliban.

Increasingly though the state’s response to drone strikes cannot be seen in isolation. Where there was initially hope that the government would provide political leadership and assert itself in the foreign policy and national security domains, now there just seems to be ambivalence. Not even the prime minister’s decision to keep the foreign ministry portfolio for himself and close advisers — in the face of strong criticism from the foreign policy elite — has yielded any significant diplomatic initiative on any front. It was and is Nawaz Sharif’s choice to have focused on the energy crisis after taking office, but then perhaps it was best to give the foreign ministry a full-time minister and a clear set of directions.

On drones, there is little significantly new that can be done. To the extent that Pakistan has applied pressure to get America to strike less frequently, that has already been achieved. The best option was and remains for the state to regain control of the areas where drones strike, overwhelmingly in the Waziristan agencies. Beyond that, the problem is of politics: tacit acceptance of the utility of strikes and overt opposition to them is a political cul-de-sac in which the last government was trapped. If something is unacceptable and a red line is crossed and yet no response comes, governments tend to lose credibility. On drones, the PML-N already appears to be falling off the tightrope.

More From This Section

Scope of suo motu

THE judicial conference held in Islamabad over the weekend ended with an important declaration read out by Supreme...

Another attack on the media

THE murderous attack on Hamid Mir, one of Pakistan’s most recognisable faces in the TV news industry, may have ...

Army security for polio teams

THE numbers speak for themselves. Out of 47 total cases of polio so far recorded in Pakistan this year, North...

More than money needed

IF it weren’t for the history and the present context, it would have been a grand announcement. Balochistan, Prime...


Comments are closed.

Comments (3)

Feroz
September 2, 2013 5:38 pm

On matters of Foreign policy and Security, PM Sharif appears to be stuck between a rock and a hard place. Doubt the situation would have been any different even if someone else was occupying the august chair.

bubba
September 2, 2013 8:35 pm

Editor assumes that the USA drone policy is somehow influenced by Pakistan - that's a BIG assumption. USA has made it's drone policy perfectly clear and announced it's changed policy before Sharif took office. Chances are that even the change in frequency of drone attacks has zero to do to with Pakistan complaints and everything to do with Obama's new policy. You want to control drone strikes - fine - get rid of the terrorist.

Javed
September 3, 2013 5:01 am

Reign in on conflicting activities under the national interests of Pakistan and all will become normal.

Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page