IT is heart-rending to know about the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria. The US Secretary of State, John Kerry, has explicitly claimed the use of chemical weapons by Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

However, Russia and China don’t believe in American allegations, saying the West had not been able to provide concrete evidence of the use of chemical weapons.

The use of chemical weapons may be true or false accusation just like Saddam Hussein’s WMD as pictures of some patients in hospitals cannot be classified categorically as of those suffering from chemical reactions.

If the eyewitnesses claim is true, then the world should get corrective measures sanctioned only by the UN and not unilaterally sanctioned and acted upon by the US or its allies.

They were proved wrong in Iraq and could possibly be wrong again in Syria’s case too to misguide the world’s opinion for their vested political agenda.

Prior to the Iraq war, it was being propagated that Saddam had chemical weapons. Gen Colin Powell gave an interview on TV showing sites of nuclear facilities in Iraq that instigated the war against Iraq. But the US failed to find WMD in Iraq, proving American assessment wrong.

Although use of chemical weapons or WMD should not be permitted to save innocent lives, corrective measures should be taken only through the UN, avoiding full-scale war that may destabilise the area politically and economically for a long time.

MOHAMMAD ASHRAF
Winnipeg, Canada

More From This Section

Computerisation of arms licences

SINDH has enforced computerisation of arms licences, and Punjab is likely to follow suit. Both say this will improve...

Jallianwala Bagh

AT least 1,300 civilians were killed in Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, on Besakhi Day of April 13, 1919, as, in...

Safety measures needed

ONE of the sources of the spread of polio and dengue virus in Pakistan is its terrible sewerage system. This could ...

Bilawal House

BILAWAL Bhutto-Zardari is a smart, young person and people look up to him. I have just a small request for him. I...


Comments are closed.

Comments (5)

Tahir Rasul
August 30, 2013 9:35 am

It is in the US interest to have wars and conflicts occurring. In the case somehow a sudden ceasing of all hostilities takes place in the world, the one country which would be hit below the belt would be US. It is therefore to their advantage to cause such conflicts, use up martial equipment made in their country, and then ask the world to pay for that. Sadly the world does not understand that, as yet.

SRK
August 30, 2013 12:12 pm

Good assessment.

khadim
August 30, 2013 2:28 pm

If Syria has used WMD then the world should get corrective measures sanctioned only by the UN not by America and its allies.

B J Shroff
August 30, 2013 5:12 pm

Why is killing by conventional weapons accepted but killing by chemical weapons not accepted? Shouldn't the world unite against killing humans regardless of types of weapon used??

tanveer
August 30, 2013 8:06 pm

it is amazing...why always America remains successful to find out in which country chemical weopons r being used and other counteries remain unable to find out.....the reason is that america has a very sympathetic attitude it can not see cruelty in the world and drone attacks in pakistan is a very gud prrof for it.........no actually america has its own interests.in which countery it has its own interests it finds out the use of chemical weapons.

Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page