Syria and American threats

Published Aug 30, 2013 08:19am

IT is heart-rending to know about the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria. The US Secretary of State, John Kerry, has explicitly claimed the use of chemical weapons by Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

However, Russia and China don’t believe in American allegations, saying the West had not been able to provide concrete evidence of the use of chemical weapons.

The use of chemical weapons may be true or false accusation just like Saddam Hussein’s WMD as pictures of some patients in hospitals cannot be classified categorically as of those suffering from chemical reactions.

If the eyewitnesses claim is true, then the world should get corrective measures sanctioned only by the UN and not unilaterally sanctioned and acted upon by the US or its allies.

They were proved wrong in Iraq and could possibly be wrong again in Syria’s case too to misguide the world’s opinion for their vested political agenda.

Prior to the Iraq war, it was being propagated that Saddam had chemical weapons. Gen Colin Powell gave an interview on TV showing sites of nuclear facilities in Iraq that instigated the war against Iraq. But the US failed to find WMD in Iraq, proving American assessment wrong.

Although use of chemical weapons or WMD should not be permitted to save innocent lives, corrective measures should be taken only through the UN, avoiding full-scale war that may destabilise the area politically and economically for a long time.

MOHAMMAD ASHRAF
Winnipeg, Canada


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Shaan, heal thyself

SHAAN Shahid is a pride of our film industry. His undiminishing respect and exemplary contributions to Lollywood ...

Sleep deprivation

THERE are no two opinions about the health benefits of rising early. But Ms Shaista’s mention of the West as the...

PAT sit-in ends

SOME people would say that a 70-day sit-in in Islamabad was a failure as the ‘revolution’ claimed by Dr Tahirul...

Comments (5) Closed


Tahir Rasul
Aug 30, 2013 09:35am

It is in the US interest to have wars and conflicts occurring. In the case somehow a sudden ceasing of all hostilities takes place in the world, the one country which would be hit below the belt would be US. It is therefore to their advantage to cause such conflicts, use up martial equipment made in their country, and then ask the world to pay for that. Sadly the world does not understand that, as yet.

SRK
Aug 30, 2013 12:12pm

Good assessment.

khadim
Aug 30, 2013 02:28pm

If Syria has used WMD then the world should get corrective measures sanctioned only by the UN not by America and its allies.

B J Shroff
Aug 30, 2013 05:12pm

Why is killing by conventional weapons accepted but killing by chemical weapons not accepted? Shouldn't the world unite against killing humans regardless of types of weapon used??

tanveer
Aug 30, 2013 08:06pm

it is amazing...why always America remains successful to find out in which country chemical weopons r being used and other counteries remain unable to find out.....the reason is that america has a very sympathetic attitude it can not see cruelty in the world and drone attacks in pakistan is a very gud prrof for it.........no actually america has its own interests.in which countery it has its own interests it finds out the use of chemical weapons.