Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron is seen addressing the House of Commons in this still image taken from video in London August 29, 2013. — Photo by Reuters
Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron is seen addressing the House of Commons in this still image taken from video in London August 29, 2013. — Photo by Reuters
Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron. — Photo by Reuters
Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron. — Photo by Reuters
Britain's opposition Labour leader Ed Miliband is seen addressing the House of Commons in this still image taken from video in London August 29, 2013. — Photo by Reuters
Britain's opposition Labour leader Ed Miliband is seen addressing the House of Commons in this still image taken from video in London August 29, 2013. — Photo by Reuters

LONDON: British lawmakers have rejected their government's call for military strikes against the Syrian regime, leaving the US to look elsewhere for international partners while reserving the right to act alone against Damascus.

The British House of Commons voted Thursday to defy Prime Minister David Cameron's bid to win support for military intervention over the Syrian regime's suspected use of chemical weapons against its own people.

Speaking in Manila Friday, US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel insisted Washington is still seeking an “international coalition” to take action against the Syrian regime.

“Our approach is to continue to find an international coalition that will act together,” Hagel told a news conference.

Hagel said Washington respected the British parliament's stance rejecting participation in any punitive strikes against Syria's regime.

“We are continuing to consult with the British as with all of our allies.

That consultation includes ways forward together on a response to this chemical weapons attack in Syria,” he added.

The decision also came after the failure of an improbable eleventh-hour effort by British diplomats to win UN backing for action against Bashar al-Assad's regime at a meeting of the permanent members of the Security Council.

"It is clear to me that the British parliament, reflecting the views of the British people, does not want to see British military action. I get that and the government will act accordingly," Cameron said.

That, combined with deadlock at the United Nations, appeared to effectively sound the death knell for the idea of a broad-based Western military coalition, although other American allies might still participate.

But even before the surprise British vote, the White House had signalled that it was ready to act regardless of UN or allied support.

"We certainly are interested in engaging with the global international community on this issue," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.

"But at the same time, the president's chief accountability is to the American people that he was elected to protect.

"The president believes strongly in making the kinds of decisions and taking the kinds of steps that are necessary to protect our core national security interests that we've acknowledged are at stake in this situation."

Earlier, envoys from the permanent five members of the UN Security Council — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States — had met at UN headquarters in New York.

The 45-minute meeting was the second since Britain proposed a draft resolution to permit "all necessary measures" to protect Syrian civilians after a suspected chemical weapons attack last week.

But none of the envoys commented as they left.

Earlier in the week reports had suggested that a Western strike was imminent, but questions have been raised about the quality of the intelligence linking Assad to the attack.

The White House reached out to US lawmakers, with the president's top aides briefing congressional leaders in a 90 minute conference call.

Some members of Congress voiced support for limited, surgical strikes, while urging the administration to continue consulting closely with the Congress.

Nancy Pelosi, the minority leader in the House, said she agreed with House Speaker John Boehner that "there needs to be more consultation with all members of Congress and additional transparency into the decision making process and timing, and that the case needs to be made to the American people.

"It is clear that the American people are weary of war. However, Assad gassing his own people is an issue of our national security, regional stability and global security. We must be clear that the United States rejects the use of chemical weapons by Assad or any other regime," she said.

US warships armed with scores of cruise missiles are converging on the eastern Mediterranean, and US military officials have said they are ready to launch a powerful barrage against regime targets in Syria.

Assad's ally Russia has blocked all attempts to toughen international sanctions against Damascus or authorize outside force to punish or unseat the regime.

Syria, meanwhile, is in the 29th month of a vicious civil war in which more than 100,000 people are credibly reported to have died.

As the stand-off continues, a team of UN inspectors are investigating reports that last week's gas attack outside Damascus killed more than 350 people, including women and children.

A UN spokesman said Thursday that the team had collected "considerable" evidence and will brief UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon soon after they leave Syria on Saturday.

"Starting tomorrow he will try to reach out to member states and take discussions forward on the question of what is happening in Syria," the spokesman said.

Ban has appealed for the inspectors to be allowed to complete their work before the major powers decide any follow-up action.

Assad remained defiant in the face of the Western threats.

"Syria will defend itself in the face of any aggression," state television cited him as telling a visiting delegation of Yemeni politicians.

He vowed that any attack would result in "victory" for the Syrian people.

His regime has denied using chemical weapons and blamed "terrorist" rebels.

The mood among Damascus residents was fearful, while security forces prepared for possible air attacks by pulling back soldiers from potential targets and introducing tougher controls at roadblocks and hospitals.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Comments (7) Closed




W.Shaikh
Aug 30, 2013 06:13am

Common sense prevailed. A very good news. I pray for peace every where in the world.

shakeel ahmed
Aug 30, 2013 10:31am

I would like to appreciate british parliamant has rejceted to attack and colliation partner of usa,

I have seen in Iraq there was no any evidence of chemical weapon use but usa had attached in iraq and hundred of thousand of people lost their lives.

I understand that usa wants to show their power in only mulism country if usa a power full country why not go to war with any powoer country like russia, china , and north koera.

at last i would also reqest to american people please protest against your govt. if they come to war with syria.

thanks

aslam minhas
Aug 30, 2013 10:34am

Same old story of Iraq being repeated in Syria: 'WMD in Iraq' howled American Press; they found nothing but Iraq was bombed into stone age. At least Brits are wisened up. The same can not be said about the bull in china shop, Uncle Sam. Now Uncle wants to try his latest weapons against Syria for liberty and democracy. Arabs remain forever divided and help Uncle to massacre them wholesale be it in Palestine, Lebanon, Yemen, Lybia, Iraq, Egypt or Syria. It is a hopeless case down there in the middle east.

Ajmal Hussain
Aug 30, 2013 11:29am

Sir, Every one knows the American designs. It has invaded the Islamic Countries one after the other and has killed and mamed millions of people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt. The world is not blind. The US is drum beating democracy but what it did in Egypt by toppling the democratically elected Govt. of Mursy? What type of sanctions were previously not imposed against the democratically elected Govt. of Hammas? The US itself creates a "pretext" and then invades a country whether it is right or wrong? Now it is waging war against Syria, the the next target will be Iran, then Pakistan and so on. The only way out is that every country must proliferate, make atomic bombs, build up nuclear arsenal indeed eat grass but be ready for war. See the example of North Korea. In case North Korea did not had nuclear arsenal and its delivery systems, it fate was clearly written like Iraq and Afghanistan. The Americans only know the language of tit for tat and nothing else. The Mayor of Japan was once asked "If Japan had Atomic Bombs during World War - II, would the Americans have had dropped Atom Bombs on Japan?" "The Americans would not even had thought about dropping of bombs!" The US only understands a powerful blow with an iron fist on its face. Do not wonder elsewhere. Focus on your security with as much Atomic Bombs as you can proliferate if you desire to keep the "World Biggest Terrorist - the USA" far beyond your borders. Send curse on its friendship, its aid and its co-operation. It is a wicked Fox, it eats you if you are weak even if you are a friend.

Urooj
Aug 30, 2013 12:30pm

Wise decision by british parliment. War is not the solution, only by dialogue this issue will resolve in a best way.

Proud Pakistani
Aug 30, 2013 03:16pm

Do see how much hypocrisy is hidden in the stance of the US. At one end it is still not confirmed who did the chemical attacks and on the other end Nancy Pelosi who is an office holder is stating the Assad gased his own people. Where is the evidence Ms. Nancy? Or is it like Iraq all over again... No WMD but then again who cares as long as the media is with the US.

Secondly, John Earnest says that president needs to protect the national interest of the people of US.. uh...so how does Syria attacks hurt the national interests of the US ?? DUH ... unless once again there is oil involved .. or something...

People of the US.. please start using your brains instead of sitting like dumb potatoes in front of the television and accepting whatever fox news has to tell you.

Rana
Aug 30, 2013 09:13pm

Hopefully this will be just the slap Cameron needs right now.