Education for the poor

Published Aug 15, 2013 07:51am

THE less privileged people in a society like ours can take no benefits from the education they get. They remain mired in the societal system because of their peculiar social construction.

With this sort of education they are neither able to take part in the process of metamorphosis of their society nor are they able to get a good job because their talents remain suppressed during the process. So education for them is a hindrance rather than help.

In terms of job opportunities, they are losers because recruitment by government departments is purely the domain of the corrupt and self-centric politicians, while for civil service posts through the FPSC or PPSC, they have to go through the selection process and owing to the nature and quality of their training at public-sector institutions, if they, by chance, pass the written portion of the examinations, then their personality will be scrutinised in terms of their suitability for those very jobs by seasoned bureaucrats.

They need a balanced personality for these very slots which the less privileged lack. The development of a balanced personality is possible in a balanced socio- politico-economic environment which they lack.

Moreover, they have to compete with their well-off compatriots during the selection process. As there exists a world of difference between the schooling, social and home environment and culture of obedience to those who are having access to the corridors of power, so they are rejected because they are not suitable for these slots. These commissions are not rejecting the candidates but the very system of which they are production.

How true is Rousseau when he says: “Man is born free but everywhere he is in chains”. So the chains of poverty are too strong to be broken by the hollow education system.

One can’t solve this catch-22 puzzle by suggestions which would be a cry in wilderness because the people who are at the helm of affairs are the jealous guardians of this rotten and corrupt system. They fear that if the system goes, they will follow suit.

There are two solutions:

(i) Philanthropists should come forward and take the responsibility of educating the less-privileged people by establishing their own educational institutions.

(ii) Social workers and human-rights organisations should convince the government to provide a special quota for the class on the fashion of women and minorities.

This must not be pronounced as division of society which is already fragmented into innumerable groups and classes, but a system based on justice.

We can conclude that this is necessary because these unfortunate people are as much part and parcel of this country as are the others. It is also the demand of democracy owing to the majority of the poor.

The issue is not because of the sharp vertical differences but the politicisation of these differences which has dented the very fabric of society.

Aristotle once said: “Education is ornament in prosperity and refuge in adversity”. In our case, it is a quagmire for those born in adversity.

ADIL KHAN
Peshawar


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Terrorists’ sanctuaries

AS a horrofic national tragedy has happened, serious questions need to be raised. If the masterminds are in...

Delayed action

THIS putative plan of action that all politicians have sworn to frame through a committee required the death of 146...

Comments (1) Closed




illawarrior
Aug 15, 2013 08:39am

Why do you think the answer lies with philanthropists or social workers or someone else? It is up to the Pakistani people themselves to insist that their government provides an adequate education system for all, that equips its people with the skills required for gainful employment.