Bhagwandas as NAB chief

Published Aug 13, 2013 07:23am

THIS is apropos the news report ( Aug 8). Subsequent to the nomination of Justice (r) Rana Bhagwandas as chairman of the NAB by the leader of opposition, a debate has ensued regarding his eligibility for appointment in view of Section 5 of the Federal Public Service Commission Ordinance 1977, promulgated by the martial law regime of Gen Ziaul Haq, which reads as:

“Ineligibility for further employment: On ceasing to hold office, a member shall not be eligible for further employment in the service of Pakistan.”

As Bhagwandas has served as chairman of the FPSC, this section debars him from assuming any other position.

But, as Bhagwandas enjoys extremely high reputation as a judge since 1967 when he started his career in the judiciary as a civil judge till his attaining the peak of his career as an acting Chief Justice of Pakistan in 2007, many demanded to amend Section 5 of the FPSC Ordinance to remove the bar.

Perhaps the government and the opposition are considering this option quite seriously. On the other hand, there are certain sections, including the PTI, which though hold Bhagwandas in high esteem are not in favour of amending the relevant section of the ordinance.

I have the privilege of knowing Rana Bhagwandas for a quite some time and have worked with him on the Selection Board of Sindh Madressatul Islam University, where he serves as a member. He is an extraordinary son of Pakistan, whom I shall place in the category of Abdul Sattar Edhi, Dr Adibul Hassan Rizvi and Justice A.R. Cornelius. The greatest example of his selflessness and high standards of integrity came to light when in 2007 he, as acting chief justice of Pakistan, paved the way for restoration of Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry. In this, neither the lure of his getting the position of CJP nor the pressures of the then civil-military dispensation could influence him.

Regarding amending the FPSC Ordinance to remove the bar, I feel that it should be done without any delay as the relevant section is discriminatory. When there is no bar on a general, justice, bureaucrat or any political office-holder, who enjoys greater power and opportunities of rewarding people of their choice than members and chairpersons of the FPSC, why should they be discriminated?

Here, it should be remembered that the laws are not static and go through an evolutionary process in accordance with the needs and aspirations of society. The FPSC Ordinance, promulgated by a dictator, neither was nor is sacrosanct, which cannot be amended. In fact, it has been amended several times: the last being a few years back when the tenure of the chairman and members of the FPSC was reduced from five to three years.

It will be a pity if this illustrious son of Pakistan could not be considered for the position because a dictator had placed a discriminatory bar some four decades ago.

DR MUHAMMAD ALI SHAIKH
Vice-Chancellor
Sindh Madressatul Islam University
Karachi


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

A lot to surrender

PAKISTAN is surrendering 3,600 megawatts of electricity every year and eight million acre feet of water. If the...

Blasphemy ruling

The courts have convicted Asia Bibi, a poor illiterate Christian woman to death for blasphemy. The courts did ask if...

Gullu Butt

WHILE surfing TV channels recently I saw Gullu Butt on one of the local channels giving an interview. The host was...

Comments (4) (Closed)


Sultan Khan
Aug 13, 2013 08:28am

No one is indispensable. Neither Bhagwandas nor Iftikhar. Bhagwandas may be a very illustrious man because he got the opportunity to become illustrious ( millions talented ones die in the remote villages and mountains without having been offered any opportunity neither by nature nor by state). What if Bhagwandas dies the next day after becoming NAB chairman? No amendment should be made only for the sake of one "beloved" person. The system must be based on solid foundations. The icons, Mahatir Muhammad and Li Kwan U have gone but Malaysia and Singapore are still prospering.

Asad ul hassan
Aug 13, 2013 11:28am

I think this letter was written by Mr Bhagwandas himself !! or what favour does Dr Shaikh want ????

Abdul Fatah Malik
Aug 14, 2013 04:57am

The letter has some very valid arguments, which need to be looked into on merit without any bias. To reject arguments given in a balanced manner in the letter, one has to come up with even stronger logical grounds. Dr Shaikh deserves appreciation for presenting his point of view in logical manner.

fida sayani
Aug 14, 2013 07:26am

@Sultan Khan: Mahatir and Li are gone but Malaysia and Singapore have many illustrious sons. On the other hand Pakistan produces incompetent individual.