TALKS towards a Bilateral Investment Treaty with the United States are starting again. It is worth bearing in mind that this effort has been going on for almost a decade and that past negotiations have run aground on more than one occasion. The terms demanded by the US for the resolution of disputes are so stringent and bypass all domestic channels for arbitration so completely that this has become the main impediment in the negotiations. Unfortunately, this time there is an added disadvantage to the Pakistani position that the last government, in its closing days, had already initialled a draft of the treaty which gave some space to local dispute resolution mechanisms but still kept international arbitration as the ultimate forum for appeal. This agreement ran into criticism at home and the government was accused of ‘selling’ Pakistan’s interests abroad.

So it is a positive sign that both countries have once again agreed to resume talks on BIT. Pakistan already has bilateral investment treaties with 47 other countries, and almost all of them provide for the international arbitration of disputes. It is an unfortunate fact that many of these agreements were signed without careful vetting, and in almost all cases the initial draft was always placed on the table by the counterparty, not Pakistan. A number of expensive lawsuits have arisen as a result, burdening the state with high costs of litigation at international forums. This time it is very important that the draft be thoroughly scrutinised and that space be reserved for domestic institutions to serve as the first port of call for dispute resolution. But it is equally important that emotional tirades of ‘selling’ the country’s interests be avoided, and the need for foreign investors to have recourse to international arbitration be acknowledged. At the end, it would be a good thing for Pakistan to eventually have a BIT with the US, and finding the path to this outcome should be the first guiding principle in the talks ahead.

More From This Section

Yet another chance

WITH the government determined to have a dialogue with the TTP come what may, the rest of the stakeholders have...

‘Adoption’ laws

THE problem is as heart-breaking as it is readily visible. Across the country, there are children who have, for one...

Out in the open

BY renaming the library at Lal Masjid’s Jamia Hafsa seminary after Osama bin Laden, Maulana Abdul Aziz has finally...

For economic stability

GIVE the minister credit where it’s due: Ishaq Dar had promised economic stabilisation to set the stage for a...


Comments are closed.

Comments (2)

Owais Shaikh
July 19, 2013 3:46 pm

Pakistan must come out of its US-centric fixation. There are other countries with whom Pakistan can negotiate a better deal. Moreover, Pakistan needs to set its focus on the countries of Africa, where there is a lot of promise in future. There must also be a focus on the long-stalled regional integration. Pakistan is an important country but it has not been considered for trade talks with Asean unlike India and China. It is high time that limited resources, i.e. trade negotiators, should be focused in the right direction and with partners with whom the country does not have a love-hate relationship. This will allow Pakistan to benefit continuously in the long-run.

RK
July 20, 2013 3:07 am

@Owais Shaikh: Yeah trade with Euthopia Sudan and Somalia. Bright future ahead!

Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page