23 September, 2014 / Ziqa'ad 27, 1435

ISLAMABAD, July 18: Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) chairman Imran Khan has again called for a closed-door meeting with the military leadership before an APC (all parties conference) on national security.

Mr Khan who is in London issued a press release on Thursday, reiterating his earlier stance that a conference would be a futile exercise if it was held before fully knowing the underlying facts about the country’s involvement in the ongoing war on terror.

“I realise that perhaps the facts cannot be stated in a large open forum like an APC because of national security but, at the same time, it is essential for political leaders to be apprised of these facts regarding the extent of the commitments given to the US as well as the reasons behind the continuing sectarian terrorism in the country,” Mr Khan said.

The PTI chief said that about two months ago when he was in hospital he had asked for a meeting attended by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, General Kayani and himself. The purpose was to know the truth about; one, the government’s (including the military) prevailing understanding with the US on its war on terror and drone attacks; and, two, the position of intelligence and security organisations on sectarian terrorism.

Mr Khan, who will be returning to the country towards the end of this month, said a number of APCs had been held, including those organised by the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl and the Awami National Party, but the Taliban had responded by saying that dialogue would be worthwhile only if the military was on the same page.

He said if the military and political leaderships did not hold the same view on the issue of national security no conference could resolve the issue of terrorism.

Referring to the government’s understanding with the US on the war on terror and drone attacks, he said it was imperative for the government to inform political leaders about the nature of the understanding.

He called upon the government to clarify if the recently approved IMF package was linked to the government’s support for the war on terror.

Mr Khan said Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was worst affected by terrorism and since his party headed the provincial government it wanted the federal government to clarify its position on the issue of terrorism.

Without holding a dialogue between all stakeholders on the basis of truth the issue of terrorism could not be resolved, he said.

He criticised the previous government and said it had kept the nation in dark over its understanding with the US on the war on terror and drone attacks. All the resolutions adopted by the parliament on the issues proved useless because they were discarded soon after these had been adopted.

He said that for a long period successive governments had been lying to the nation on the issue and never took political leaders into confidence. There were many hidden truths about the country’s engagement with the US and the nation needed to be informed about them, Mr Khan added.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Comments (2) (Closed)


Arshad Khan
Jul 19, 2013 08:19pm

Imran Khan was introduced into politics by General Mujeeb-ur-Rehman, media advisor to General Zia, then he was nourished and supported by General Shuja Pasha. He then was a right hand to General Musharaf in his so-called referendum. So, his insistence on involving army in politics is clearly understandable. While any kind of war is purely a political issue. That's why Winston Churchil, when England had almost lost to Germans in second world war, politically won that war and his words should be written in gold in our political/military history, "War is a very serious affair in which generals should not be involved." History is full of examples when wars lost by generals were won by politcal leaders. But individuals like Imran have nothing to learn from history.

SanityPrevails
Jul 20, 2013 12:00am

Neither he is in government nor he is leader of the opposition. Under which capacity he wants to have close door meeting with Kiyani and PM. KPK is smaller than Sindh province and if any such meeting to be held, it has to have Sindh CM nor him.