Double impact

Published Jul 15, 2013 07:35am

THE threat of violent extremism and terrorism is so deep-rooted and widespread that it has come to challenge our foundation and national integration. It has virtually torn apart our social fabric with the people losing faith in the ability of the state to challenge and arrest it. The internal security is deteriorating at a rapid pace with every passing day.

The question is who is in charge of internal security in the country? Numerous agencies are responsible, yet none has an answer to this question. A central authority to control and coordinate internal security is conspicuous by its absence.

Should the armed forces be responsible for both internal and external security? With the given resources, they have established a professional institution and a bulwark against the external threat, conventional as well as non-conventional. But other than the counterinsurgency operations in the borderland, are they effective in countering terrorism that is severely affecting the state and public at large?

The army is already overstretched, managing war-zone governance and involved in socio-economic development work in the conflict-hit areas. On the other hand, the death and destruction in the heartland has increased the vulnerability of the state manifold. If the situation is allowed to continue unabated, there will hardly be anything left worth defending for the army.

We need to know which institution is well placed and aptly structured to perform and deliver on the internal front. Is it the armed forces or civilian law-enforcement agencies? If it is the police, then what are the shortfalls? Was the institution of the police always corrupt, incompetent and politicised and will it remain like this?

Is the police in its present form well equipped and sufficiently trained to counter terrorism? Is it operationally autonomous to confront the multi-dimensional, highly complex internal threat? Why is there always an insufficient political will to depoliticise the police?

The root of the problem lies in the present pervasive political culture. The extractive political institutions will always entail extractive security institutions instead of inclusive ones; institutions that are well connected with the people and are more responsible and accountable to the community.

The main strength of the army is not tanks and planes but a merit-based selection and promotion system with quality training that enables it to devise effective operational strategy under a unified command.

Should not the police services be provided with the same organisational autonomy and resources that are made available to the armed forces? Why not? Should politicising and corruption in the police be taken as a fait accompli? Or are there alternatives that the state and society can provide?

Both the armed forces and police have equally important roles to play in their respective fields. It is not a zero-sum game; both are responsible for the security of the state and people. The need is to support and complement each other rather than operate in institutional silos.

The primary responsibility to handle law and order and combat terrorism rests with the police. Therefore, it should have requisite institutional autonomy, adequate financial provision, training resources and other welfare benefits that keep the force motivated.

The police intelligence networks and investigation agencies like the Intelligence Bureau and Federal Investigation Agency at the centre, special branches at the provincial level, the Criminal Investigation Agency at the district level and police stations and police qaumi razakars at the grassroots level need to be resourced and resurrected.

Most of these institutions have become dormant or dysfunctional due to obvious reasons. These are more inclusive institutions with a hand on the public’s pulse; they have delivered in the past and can do it again provided there is a will to get the job done.

To have a general idea of the per capita expenditure of a soldier and a policeman, one only has to look at their respective budget allocations and numerical strength. The military spends Rs1,140,000 on each soldier/officer whereas the annual spending on a policeman per capita is merely Rs340,000.

There is no alternative but to rebuild the police force as a frontline organisation to confront the internal threat, otherwise we’ll keep going in circles, wasting time and resources with criminal mafias and terrorists as elusive as ever.

There is a historic opportunity available to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to put the house in order. What remains to be seen is whether he has the ability and acumen to make a departure from the past and rise to the challenge.

Can he take all the provincial governments on board to bring a revolutionary change to the firmly entrenched politics of patronage that only breeds extractive politico-economic institutions? If not, we will only have extractive security institutions instead of inclusive ones, and the security of life and property of the hapless citizens, enshrined in the Constitution, will remain a distant dream.

The writers are a former police officer and a retired army officer.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Lawfare versus warfare

The global norm is to avoid using force against another state and to move away from a ‘warfare’ approach.

State failure or failed state?

Perish the thought that anybody will ever be held responsible for the disaster that has made the country ungovernable.

Comments (6) Closed


a.k.lal
Jul 15, 2013 09:14am

your army is the root cause of all the troubles. it takes forcibly very high per centage of budget and has no responsibility. Sensible thing is to reudce the budget by 80% and spend the money on health care, eduction etc., and be ware of army sponsered articles.

Salman
Jul 15, 2013 01:27pm

A good analysis from a former police officer and a retired army officer (though there isn

raja
Jul 15, 2013 04:16pm

Very analytical article written by two very experienced professionals but will somebody pay heed__

jamil
Jul 15, 2013 06:48pm

What did you do to bring reforms in police and get the institution out of political influence?

Dr. D. Prithipaul
Jul 15, 2013 08:37pm

So many questions which would be reasonably asked inside the offices of the Prime and Home Ministers. If they do not, as the two writers seem to assume, then the solution lies in bringing in the Sharia for the entire nation. A lateral benefit would be a consequent internal peace all the more if it be accompanied with a Sharia sanction for a jihad against India. It defies common sense that the two authors would not come forward with such a proposal.

Ado
Jul 16, 2013 03:55am

Yr army professional? Then what's it doin running businesses all over the country including security all by retirees. Gimme a break. And judging by yr OWN report pretty incompetent inspire of suckin up larger part of the budget. Yah know wht. U r right. Watching youll implode in their safe hands is awesome Cheers