01 August, 2014 / Shawwal 4, 1435

jacques-chirac-nicolas-sarkozy-edouard-balladur-670

When the shocking news came in from Karachi on May 8, 2002, of the bombing of a bus carrying employees of DCN, the French directorate of naval construction, killing 11 of them, it was naturally taken here as the work of religious extremists. After all, this was so close to the New York 9/11 attacks and the decapitation of the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl on Feb 1 the same year in the same city.

However, not very long after the tragedy, the French public had to change this perspective as further details were brought home by the media, one after the other in quick succession, of what was quickly baptised here as l’Affaire Karachi.

Today, 11 years later, the Karachi affair continues to be hot news in France and the revelations are as fascinating as they are mind-boggling in the sense that they bring in a seemingly endless list of names and events with each revelation.

So complicated in fact that the newsweekly l’Express published an article sometime ago on the subject with the headline, ‘Seven questions to ask to understand the Karachi Affair’.

The daily le Monde on its part posted on its site a video entitled “Three minutes to know all about the Karachi affair”.

But what on earth is the Karachi affair? Simply stated, it goes something like this:

In 1994 France sold three Agosta military submarines to Pakistan for, to put it roundly, one billion euros. Fifty million of these euros were set aside as ‘gift’ to be shared by some of Pakistan’s politically powerful figures of the time as well as military officers who had, one way or the other, thrown in their weight to make the deal see the light of day.

So far so good! But things started getting somewhat murky when it was discovered by the French media that an infinitesimal part of this sum, about two million euros, had trickled back to France, all in accordance with a preconceived deal, to finance the campaign of the then prime minister Edouard Balladur, who was a candidate and rival to Jacques Chirac in the presidential election of 1995.

Chirac, a rightist like Balladur himself, won the election and became the President of France. But only two years later he had to enter into an uneasy coexistence arrangement with the opposition leftist leader Lionel Jospin whom he was forced to appoint, according to the French constitution, as prime minister because of the Socialist majority in the National Assembly following the 1997 parliamentary elections.

It was only in 2002 when Chirac was re-elected and his party was enjoying a comfortable majority in the National Assembly that he had time, and powers enough, to have a closer look at the Karachi affair files. On learning that all the kickbacks had not yet been fully paid to the Pakistani collaborators, and not forgetting the fact that part of the money had financed the campaign of his rival, he took action and signed a law making the practice of paying sweeteners to foreigners on arms deals illegal.

The tirade of accusations, counter accusations and the list of the names of businessmen and politicians involved, or supposedly involved in the deal assumed unprecedented proportions when a French intelligence agency report suggested the terrorist attack in front of the Sheraton Hotel in Karachi was in fact in retaliation for the decision by Jacques Chirac to abruptly suspend further payments of commissions to Pakistanis who were involved in the sale of Agosta submarines.

Experts today describe the Karachi affair as a cobra with multiple heads. Going through all these intricate details will take up a lot of space in this column and could prove confusing to the reader, but two points remain at the focus of French newspaper, radio or television stories that recur regularly after an interval of every two or three days.

One involves a possible connection with former president Nicolas Sarkozy who had played an important role during the failed election campaign of Edouard Balladur. Sarkozy’s home and offices were recently raided by the investigation forces in an effort to recover some documentary evidence. Whether they succeeded in this was not made public.

The other element has to do with a lawsuit against Jacques Chirac on behalf of the families of the victims of Karachi bombing.

They accuse the former president, who is 81 today by the way, of involuntarily being the principal cause of the deaths of DCN employees by his decision to cancel the Agosta submarines commissions to Pakistanis.

The writer is a journalist based in Paris. (ZafMasud@gmail.com)

More From This Section

Comments (15) (Closed)


AJ
May 26, 2013 02:44pm
And who were those pakistani politicians and militarymen who were supposed to get this commission. How much of it was recieved by who and how much was still due.
Osman
May 26, 2013 02:46pm
Interestingly the kickbacks Mr. 10% received in his Swiss accounts are officially documented by French Courts: $1.3Million in advance of the sales in 1994 and $3.0Million within one year of the sale of the submarines. While the French Court found the evidence and documented it in its findings (official judgement is available on the internet for all to read), our pathetic leadership / NAB / and Swiss courts could never use the same facts presented to to them in a platter to indict the biggest thug in Pakistan for almost 2 decades? Better still, we all honoured him and made him our President instead!!!
farid
May 26, 2013 04:47pm
Pakistan, what a country where Mr. 10 % can be a president.
farid
May 26, 2013 04:48pm
Who cares in a country called"the land of pure".
Salem
May 26, 2013 06:18pm
Will the names of military people in Pakistan who received feedback will be disclosed?
Ahmed
May 26, 2013 11:07pm
Shouldnt the Supreme Court take notice of "the Karachi Affair"? 48 million euros that was given to Zardari and to Pakistani military officers is a lot of money and it would be well worth the effort to get it back from the criminals on the Pakistani side. In addition, of course, the criminals behind the murder of the 11 frenchmen need to be identified and apprehended. The damage done to Pakistan is obvious since this huge purchase of 1 billion euros was driven not by genuine "national interest" (as the military officers of that time used to harp about) but by their own greed and criminal conduct. In fact I remember reading an article back then that argued against the purchase, saying that these submarines were not of any effective defense need for Pakistan.
BRR
May 27, 2013 01:18am
It has been a practice in 3rd world countries to demand and expect kickbacks whenever any contract is ever approved / signed. No opportunity to loot is ever lost by those in power to get a kickback, and no one is immune to the lure of easy money albeit illegal.
Jalaluddin S. Hussain
May 27, 2013 05:22am
I wish the names of the military officers involved in The Karachi Affair were disclosed.
Pingle
May 27, 2013 06:10am
and who organised the bus bombing that killed so many?
Iqbal
May 27, 2013 06:19am
the names of the military people are just allegations... what was proved in the French court is the 10% of our Mr. President, the champion of democracy and reconciliation.
Zawanrima
May 27, 2013 06:39am
we cannot do anything until he is the President of Pakistan becuase he enjoys special immunity which in other words "he is above the law" until such a time when he becomes an ordinary Pakistani citizen. But history shows us that these corrupt political figures are smart enough to carve their exit routes whilst in power. The same happened to our previous leaders, recently Musharraf and same will be the case of Zardari. Unless Rule of Law prevails in this country, we may not see a light at the end of the tunnel !
Zawanrima
May 27, 2013 06:40am
this information is forbidden for public as we all know. The Military is the true master of this land.
Riaz Ahmad
May 27, 2013 07:43am
It is quite normal for a corrupt nation to have a corrupt leaders.
FACT
May 27, 2013 09:47am
AJ, kindly do your homework by yourself. If you find any more information do share it with us
Faisal
May 27, 2013 01:02pm
Since Mr. Sarkozy doesn't enjoy power in France anymore, I think now the french authorities and courts are actively pursuing the case. The problem is Mr. 10% still enjoys International Immunity as the President of the country. Lets wait till he leaves the power corridor and gets to the end he deserves.