Deep cracks between the two factions of the All Parties Hurriyat Conference (APHC) led by Syed Ali Shah Geelani and Mirwaiz Umar Farooq respectively are only too obvious since their split in 2002. But the noticeable rift between Kashmir’s head priest and Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) chief Mohammad Yasin Malik has given a new twist to the ongoing movement and divergence within its leadership in Indian-administered Kashmir.
Malik — chief of the pro-independence JKLF — accused Farooq, chairman of APHC-M of “pretence” and “swindling” funds meant for victims of the ongoing conflict. Malik also suggested that the Mirwaiz-led Hurriyat was “siding with tyrants” and “safeguarding Indian interests in Kashmir”.
Perchance it is for the first time Malik has overtly leveled charges of such a serious nature against Farooq. “I know what I’m saying. If I cannot prove these allegations I will detach myself from politics,” he told Dawn.com via telephone. Media adviser to APHC-M, Advocate Shahidul Islam told Dawn.com, “It (Malik’s statement) doesn’t deserve a comment. Mirwaiz Umar Sahib has decided not to react on this.”
The latest controversy began when the JKLF chief, despite being invited to a University of Kashmir seminar on June 4, 2013, organised by the Anjuman-e-Shari-e-Shia’an, was “debarred” from speaking on the “freedom movement of Kashmir”. Farooq was the chief guest.
Interestingly, the university authorities seldom allow pro-independence leadership a platform to speak on political issues, especially over the dispute of Kashmir. The state government has pressurised university authorities to curb all political activities and student union politics on the campus. The fact that the APHC-M leadership was allowed to organise a seminar inside the convocation complex of the university in itself has raised many eyebrows.
It is the state's worst-kept secret that politics of any kind is not allowed inside the University of Kashmir. For the past two decades mainstream politicians (pro-India), have been pitching for “de-linking politics from academics”. Ironically, a red carpet is laid by the university authorities to major leaders of the Congress party like Rahul Gandhi and leaders of the ruling National Conference from time to time.
The Anjuman, meanwhile, has dismissed all allegations leveled by Malik and termed these as “irresponsible”. In a statement issued to the press, the Anjuman said: “Malik’s statement and baseless allegations (against the Mirwaiz Hurriyat) are totally against our expectations and lack political maturity. It was only due to a paucity of time that many speakers could not share their thoughts at the seminar.”
Just because he (Malik) did not get an opportunity to make a speech, the statement said, he issued an edict that he was the lone well-wisher of the movement and others had abandoned it. The Anjuman statement further added that it became difficult to accommodate Malik because he arrived late and university authorities were pressing to conclude the proceedings by 2pm. After being informed that he won’t get time to speak, Malik said he left the seminar midway to register his protest.
According to Malik, he was invited to speak at the seminar by Ghulam Muhammad Naago, one of the aides of the Anjuman chief Agha Syed Hassan. “They talk of being the representatives of people? They are the ones who built shopping malls with the money meant for running the freedom struggle and even invited Pro-India politicians to inaugurate the malls,” Malik alleged. He was making a veiled reference to Aga Hassan, a member of the executive committee of Hurriyat-M, who had invited Minister for Agriculture Ghulam Hassan Mir for the inauguration of his shopping mall in Budgam district of Kashmir Valley in July last year.
After noting that the venue was University of Kashmir, Malik told Dawn.com, he double-checked whether he would be allowed to speak there. “The Anjuman member Mr. G M Naago assured me that I was one of the speakers and without my presence and speech the event would be incomplete.” Malik added, “It is not a matter of feeling insulted. As civilised people we do understand that sometimes due to time constraints and other compulsions everyone doesn’t get time, but in this case they are telling a blatant lie. They wanted to please the university authorities.”
Informed sources, however, said that the Anjuman had not even mentioned Malik’s name in the speaker’s list which was handed over to the university authorities for approval. An insider maintained the seminar was not a Hurriyat-M show but that decency demanded Malik should have been allowed to speak after being invited by the Anjuman. “The university authorities had even threatened to turn off the lights if the speakers touched upon Kashmiri politics. It is not Mirwaiz versus Malik, it is a mistake on part of the Anjuman,” the source added.
Meanwhile, the furious JKLF chief further said of Farooq: “What kind of revolutionaries are they? On the one hand they organize a seminar on the Iranian revolutionary Imam Khomeini but on the other they give in writing to the university authorities that they will not touch the subject of the Kashmir dispute.”
He alleged he was barred from speaking on the directions of the University of Kashmir, an order with which Hurriyat-M willingly obliged. “Some of its leaders have built luxurious houses and grand shopping malls in posh localities, and acquired other benefits by swindling money meant for victims of the conflict.” “If they claim to spearhead the resistance movement in Kashmir, how can they snatch my right to speak on the Kashmir movement? Is their job only to dupe the funds?” My organization JKLF till now has remained silent on various issues for the interest of the freedom struggle, but now it is time to speak up.”