Ambassador Robin Raphel US Coordinator for Economic Development to Pakistan addresses a press conference at residence of US Consul General in Karachi on Monday, November 29, 2010. – Photo by PPI

KARACHI: Washington and donor agencies want Pakistan to honour its commitments on new tax measures.

This was stated by US Coordinator for Economic and Development Assistance to Pakistan Robin Raphel here on Monday at a media briefing on US development initiatives, after interacting with a delegation of Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), a major coalition partner which is an outspoken opponent of the reformed general sales tax.

She said the Obama administration was trying to convince the Republican dominated-House of Representatives on disbursement of assistance to Pakistan in a transparent manner.

Answering a question about the controversial tax measures, she said that looking at Pakistan’s finances that is 9 per cent of revenue to GDP ratio, the government had to do something to enhance and broaden its revenue collection. “There are lots of ways to do that but Pakistan now has an agreement with the IMF which calls for this reformed GST and since it is our position that countries, whether Pakistan or anybody else, should live up to their international agreements, we would like to see this legislation passed,” Ms Raphel remarked.

“We and all the donors are very keen that Pakistan is able to stay in its arrangement with IMF because that it is very important and will facilitate our argument in the Congress for providing funds for Pakistan,” she said.

About transparency and accountability of disbursement of $7.5 billion aid over five years, she said the US had set up a series of benchmarks and safeguards in each project in order to track the money.

“Before we can provide funds directly to any institution they have to go through a kind of audit by a third party that we retain to see how they do their accounting and see what issues that might be with their practices,” Ms Raphel said.

These measures, she added, were meant to ensure that the funds were going in a special account and were not blended with the budget of the government.

They were retained in a special account whether at the federal, provincial, or the district levels. “So we believe that we can track the fund.” she emphasised.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.