Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper

Daily SectionMarker



Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald

Archive, Search

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Mahir Ali Kamran Shafi The Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

September 21, 2008 Sunday Ramazan 20, 1429



Interviews challenge Fox’s low standards



By James Rainey


Fox News tough guy Sean Hannity assured us this week he would press Sarah Palin for real answers – no going easy on the woman who could be the next vice president of the United States.

“No topic,” Hannity intoned, “is off limits.”

A couple of nights earlier, Fox’s hard-talking lawyer, Greta Van Susteren, promised to take us to unknown places in her exclusive interview with Alaska’s so-called First Dude, Todd Palin.

“You will see this,” Greta declared, “nowhere else!”

No, you won’t. And mercifully so. Because Hannity and Van Susteren produced three nights of infotainment so frothy, slanted and off-point that they challenged even their cable network’s low standards.

Fox boss man Roger Ailes would desperately like to have his stepchild accepted into the family of respected news sources. And the reporters who deliver many of Fox’s reports have been known to battle their employer’s partisan biases.

But given a chance to address real issues, and possibly even make news in two encounters with America’s most intriguing couple, Fox instead condescended to both Palins, with Van Susteren’s cringe-worthy paean to arctic beauty and Todd Palin’s machismo, and Hannity’s weak-kneed idolisation of Alaska’s governor.

First, let’s look at the two sessions on “Hannity & Colmes,” where the host had the responsibility of interviewing a politician who aspires to help lead the nation and who is likely to subject herself to few unscripted moments between now and Election Day.

Sinking to the occasion, Hannity lobbed softball questions, led his pliant subject to safe responses and not-so-subtly sprinkled his queries with barbs aimed at Barack Obama. He left the questions many Americans have about Palin’s record to the end, then signalled that the “so-called controversies” weren’t worthy of serious consideration.

At one point Hannity rhapsodised about Alaska’s low taxes and actually added: “I have to move to Alaska.”

I hadn’t felt so queasy since the women of ABC’s “The View” wriggled in their seats and giggled gleefully as Obama visited last spring.

Barbara Walters praised the young prince for his “passion, charisma and call for change,” not to mention his “very sexy” looks. But at least “The View” ladies allowed Elisabeth Hasselbeck to pepper Obama with questions about his controversial former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr.

And that was daytime TV.

Newsman Hannity would countenance no such unpleasantness this week during his precious hour. He smiled dreamily at Palin and said he wished he had more time. And the Republican governor – hair down, smiling, relaxed – clearly knew she was playing on her home court.

The Fox commentator wasted no time in priming the partisan pump – suggesting that Obama’s recent statements on the economy were for “political gain” and that his call for higher taxes on the rich amounted to “class warfare.”

If Fox had intended a probing interview, it wouldn’t have assigned one of its most contentious mouthpieces.

Wouldn’t Brit Hume have asked Palin to clarify, for example, her inane assertion that the ability to see Russia from her state’s far western shore somehow helped her understand that country?

How about pressing the governor when (like Obama) she ducked a straightforward question about whether insurance giant AIG should receive a government bailout?

Where was Hannity’s incredulity when Palin lapsed into amnesia, again, when asked about her initial support of the “bridge to nowhere”?

If I had been thinking clearly, I would have known this interview would have nothing to do with journalism and everything to do with buttressing the Fox brand.

Much as McCain secured his conservative “base” by choosing Sarah Barracuda in the first place, Fox played to its most loyal fans by not trifling with their view of Palin as a charming and accomplished everywoman.

Van Susteren made that strategy even more apparent during her embarrassing interview with Palin’s husband, in which she seemed to morph into a cheerleader. Go Wasilla High Warriors! Go Todd!

Todd, don’t you know, helped build his own home! Flies his own float plane! Fishes for sockeye! Drives his snow machine 112 mph!—Dawn/LA Times-Washington Post News Service







Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

RSS Feed

Newsletters

DAWN Logo

News on Mobile

e-paper print replica


The DAWN Media Group

| About Us | Advertising info | Subscription | Feedback | Contributions | Privacy Policy | Help | Contact us |