Total earnings of Rs7500, a little under $100 a month, from two jobs was not enough to make a living.

Mohammad Jaffar a young migrant working 14 hours a day in Karachi as a loader during the day with a contractor and a waiter at a small restaurant in the evening, was forced by demands of survival to vacate Rs3000( about $40 a month) rented house and shift to a hutment with his family.

Jaffar arrived in Karachi with his wife four years back. Despite being hardworking today he is deep into debt struggling to sustain his family of four children. One of the four, Azam is ill and dying for health care which is expensive and beyond means of his family.

But Jaffar still prefers to stay on in Karachi over going back to his home village in southern Punjab because he is still better off in the city. However, if this is better what the worse would be like?

For this family and their likes life is nothing but a painful journey into disappointments. Indeed, there is little to suggest that those in power really care.

The fate of poor in resource rich country is as dismal as it can get. Excluded from the gains of high growth during 2004-07, they are now being advised by the wise men of the government to endure more than their fair share of pain as the economy is under a difficult patch. For both internal and external reasons, Pakistan is currently grappling with high inflation and slower growth.

Today of 1000, some 79 infants die at birth, 99 more die before their fifth birthday. According to latest figures compiled by international economic monitoring agencies, Pakistan has the highest proportion of under nourished population in Asia Pacific region. The government might feel uncomfortable with such observations but would find it hard to challenge them because it is still busy collecting and processing data on social indicators for 2006.

Sadly this is where the country has reached riding the Asian tide-- what the ex-prime minister Shaukat Aziz used to call ‘stellar growth’ ----when the sale of motorcycles multiplied from 90 thousand to 900 thousand.

Some press reports suggest that the elected President will lead Pakistan’s delegation to the UN General Assembly in New York later this month. A few high profile meetings are reported on the sidelines of the meeting. But nothing has so far been published about one of the main themes of the UN Sept 25 meeting that is to review the progress on Millennium Development Goals. One wonders, with so little to show in absence of the current background material, how productive the participation of the political leadership would be in a meeting of 188 nations that made a solemn pledge to the eight goals in 2000.

At the half way point to the target year of 2015, the world prepares to meet to take stock of the progress made towards these goals. The leaders in words of UN are ‘to review progress, identify gaps and commit to concrete efforts, resources and mechanisms to bridge the gaps’.

Pakistan’s participation is expected to be as embarrassing as its progress towards 38 targets that it set out for itself to achieve eight goals. These MDGs are: eradicate extreme poverty and hunger, achieve universal primary education, promote gender equality and empower women, reduce child mortality, improve maternal health, combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases, ensure environment sustainability, develop a global partnership for development.

Pakistan committed to half the poverty rate to bring it down to 13 per cent by 2015.

The elected leadership is too preoccupied by other issues to spare a thought for MDGs or targets. The government functionaries have failed to deliver. No one expects any wonders from them but unfortunately, they have also not been able to bring out 2006 MDGs progress report in September 2008.

“The report of the year 2006 should be ready over the next few months” Dr Arshad Amjad, Chief Economist Planning Commission told Dawn from Islamabad.

Salman Farooqui, Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission, when contacted was unable to comment off hand on the issue. He, however, directed Dr Mohammad Aslam Khan, specialist on fiscal and monetary affairs, Planning Commission to respond to Dawn’s queries. The gentleman told Dawn that Pakistan is on track on many goals but was not able to justify the delay of the publication of the progress report that last appeared in March 2007 reviewing the performance for 2005.

Insiders told Dawn that the delay was because of the government’s interference in functioning of the cell responsible for processing and analysing data. “We are not allowed to work with numbers independently. All relevant numbers are audited by the government so that no number that the government perceives to be harmful to its political image is made public”.

“The government is very sensitive with poverty figures as they carry political weight. The last government forced us to suppress provincial poverty numbers as they reflected increasing intra provincial disparities”, a senior economist privy to the monitoring process said.

Most worrying is the low level of public awareness on the eight goals or the 38 specific targets. There is absolutely no pressure on the government from local stakeholders to reshape its spending pattern or re-arrange its order of priorities to achieve targets leading to sustainable development.

Most leaders and people, who should be spearheading the process in achieving those goals, when contacted, were little or not informed at all on the subject. Many admitted that they were hearing the word MDGs for the first time. This unaware mass includes people from all strata of society including drivers, clerks, plumbers, teachers, salesmen, doctors, lawyers, traders, housewives, etc.

Except in the Punjab, the situation in rest of the three provinces is bleak. In NWFP, some spade work started in 2005 but the tide of extremism and related law and order challenges did not allow the provincial government to move beyond planning stage. The Sindh government was found to be too fragmented to focus on anything worthwhile. Balochistan is too volatile politically to plan or execute a programme for MDGs.

Even the private sector that is supposed to be the key driver of the economy has totally been kept out of the picture in formulation of targets or their implementation. Tanvir Sheikh, President FPCCI admitted his ignorance about the goals this week over telephone from Multan.

It appears that so far it has all been a closed door ministry level activity. Yes, the reference is made to the goals in official documents such as Medium Term Development Framework (MTDF), the State Bank annual reports and the Economic Survey. The two progress reports were prepared primarily for the consumption of World Bank, IMF, UNDP, etc.