UNITED NATIONS, July 12: Russia and China on Friday vetoed a resolution backed by the US and Britain in the UN Security Council to impose sanctions on Zimbabwe for holding a presidential election that was boycotted by the opposition candidate.

The resolution would have imposed an arms embargo on Zimbabwe and slapped financial and travel restrictions on President Robert Mugabe and 13 other officials, and called for the appointment of a UN’s special envoy for the African country.

Nine countries voted for the US-drafted text; five, including Russia and China, opposed it and one abstained in the 15-nation council.

The result marked a failure by the western bloc to persuade Russia and China into at least abstaining from the vote, owing to the gravity of the crisis in Zimbabwe.

It also sparked angry exchanges between the big powers. A seething British Ambassador Johan Sawers said: “The key thing is that the Russians (had) decided to vote against it”. “The assessment here is that China would not have vetoed it on its own because they have a range of conflicting interests at stake.”

Zalmay Khalilzad, the US ambassador to the United Nations, was particularly harsh in his remarks about Russia, saying that Moscow had supported a joint statement criticising the situation in Zimbabwe by the G-8 leaders at their meeting in Japan earlier this week. “The U-turn in the Russian position is particularly surprising and disturbing,” Mr Khalilzad said, adding it had raised questions about Moscow’s reliability as a partner.

Opponents of the resolution, which included South Africa, Libya and Vietnam, argued that Zimbabwe was not a threat to international peace and security — the qualification for eliciting the council action.

They said imposing sanctions over an election was interference in Zimbabwe’s internal affairs. They said that ongoing talks in South Africa between the country’s ruling and opposition parties should be given a chance.

Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin responded that the resolution was “an ever more obvious attempt to take the council beyond its charter prerogatives and beyond maintaining international peace and security. We believe such practices to be illegitimate and dangerous.”

Before the vote, Chinese Ambassador Wang Guangya told reporters that Beijing could not accept the language of the resolution and wanted dialogue between Zimbabwe’s parties, “so to adopt such a resolution at this time would not be helpful.”

Zimbabwe’s Ambassador Boniface Chidyausiku observed after the vote that the Security Council had refused to be “intimidated” by Britain, former colonial ruler of Zimbabwe, and the United States. “The United Nations has stuck to the Charter,” he said.

Voting for the resolution were the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Belgium, Croatia, Burkina Faso, Panama and Costa Rica. Indonesia abstained.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...